Literature DB >> 18926800

Visual modulation of proprioceptive reflexes during movement.

Pratik K Mutha1, Philippe Boulinguez, Robert L Sainburg.   

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that feedback circuits such as reflexes can be tuned by setting their gains prior to movement onset during both posture and movement tasks. However, such a control strategy requires that perturbation contingencies be predicted during movement planning and that task goals remain fixed. Here we test the hypothesis that feedforward regulation of reflex circuits also occurs during the course of movement in response to changes in task goals. Participants reached to a visual target that was occasionally jumped on movement initiation, thus changing task goals. Reflex responses were elicited through a mechanical perturbation on the same trial, 100 ms after the target jump. Impedance to the perturbation was tuned to the direction of the preceding jump: reflex responses increased or decreased depending on whether the perturbation opposed or was consistent with the target jump. This modulation, although sensitive to the direction of the jump, was insensitive to jump amplitude, as tested in a follow-up experiment. Our findings thus suggest that modulation of reflex circuits occurs online, and is sensitive to changes in visual target information. In addition, our results suggest a two-level model for visuo-motor control that reflects hierarchical neural organization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18926800      PMCID: PMC2752307          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.09.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  48 in total

1.  Intersegmental dynamics are controlled by sequential anticipatory, error correction, and postural mechanisms.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; C Ghez; D Kalakanis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The influence of prior instruction to the subject on an apparently involuntary neuro-muscular response.

Authors:  P H HAMMOND
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1956-04-27       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The human motor control system's response to mechanical perturbation: should it, can it, and does it ensure stability?

Authors:  Z Hasan
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Interlimb transfer of load compensation during rapid elbow joint movements.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning.

Authors:  C M Harris; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-08-20       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning.

Authors:  S J Goodbody; D M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A comparison of computer-based methods for the determination of onset of muscle contraction using electromyography.

Authors:  P W Hodges; B H Bui
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-12

8.  Patterned ballistic movements triggered by a startle in healthy humans.

Authors:  J Valls-Solé; J C Rothwell; F Goulart; G Cossu; E Muñoz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory.

Authors:  J R Lackner; P Dizio
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Response of arm flexor muscles to magnetic and electrical brain stimulation during shortening and lengthening tasks in man.

Authors:  G Abbruzzese; M Morena; L Spadavecchia; M Schieppati
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  24 in total

1.  Error Detection is Critical for Visual-Motor Corrections.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Pratik K Mutha
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  The temporal evolution of feedback gains rapidly update to task demands.

Authors:  Michael Dimitriou; Daniel M Wolpert; David W Franklin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Long-latency muscle activity reflects continuous, delayed sensorimotor feedback of task-level and not joint-level error.

Authors:  Seyed A Safavynia; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Coordination deficits in ideomotor apraxia during visually targeted reaching reflect impaired visuomotor transformations.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg; Kathleen Y Haaland
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Experimental measure of arm stiffness during single reaching movements with a time-frequency analysis.

Authors:  Davide Piovesan; Alberto Pierobon; Paul DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Shared bimanual tasks elicit bimanual reflexes during movement.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Motor lateralization is characterized by a serial hybrid control scheme.

Authors:  V Yadav; R L Sainburg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Rapid motor responses quickly integrate visuospatial task constraints.

Authors:  Lu Yang; Jonathan A Michaels; J Andrew Pruszynski; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Hemispheric specialization for movement control produces dissociable differences in online corrections after stroke.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Pratik K Mutha; Kathleen Y Haaland; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Interlimb differences in coordination of rapid wrist/forearm movements.

Authors:  Gautum A Srinivasan; Tarika Embar; Robert Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.