Literature DB >> 19647787

The influence of target sensory modality on motor planning may reflect errors in sensori-motor transformations.

F R Sarlegna1, A Przybyla, R L Sainburg.   

Abstract

Multi-sensory integration studies have shown that combining heterogeneous signals can optimize motor performance by reducing errors inherent to any single modality. However, it has also been suggested that errors could arise from erroneous transformations between heterogeneous coordinate systems. Here we investigated the effect of visuo-proprioceptive integration on the control of multi-joint arm movements by manipulating target modality. When the target was visual, movement control required the integration of visual target signals with proprioceptive signals about limb configuration. In contrast, when the target was the unseen fingertip, movement control relied solely on proprioceptive signals since visual feedback of hand position was precluded. We hypothesized that a faulty integration of visual target signals with proprioceptive arm signals would result in a less accurate planning of visually-targeted movements with respect to proprioceptively-targeted movements. Different inter-joint coordinations patterns were tested by varying starting hand position. Results showed larger initial trajectory deviations from target direction for visually-targeted movements involving substantial shoulder and elbow motions. Inverse dynamic analysis revealed that these deviations were associated with less efficient intersegmental coordination. The control of visually-targeted movements thus appeared sub-optimal compared to proprioceptively-targeted movements when considering theoretical models of motor planning assuming kinematic or dynamic optimizations. Additional experiments further highlighted the effect of target position, and visual feedback of starting hand position, on motor planning for proprioceptively- and visually-targeted movements. Our findings suggest that the integration of heterogeneous sensory signals related to hand and target positions introduces errors in motor planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19647787      PMCID: PMC2765049          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.07.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  73 in total

1.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; D Kalakanis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Integration of visual and somatosensory target information in goal-directed eye and arm movements.

Authors:  S F Neggers; H Bekkering
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Behavioral reference frames for planning human reaching movements.

Authors:  Sabine M Beurze; Stan Van Pelt; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The effect of target modality on visual and proprioceptive contributions to the control of movement distance.

Authors:  Fabrice R Sarlegna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Direct comparison of the task-dependent discharge of M1 in hand space and muscle space.

Authors:  M M Morrow; L R Jordan; L E Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Directional control of planar human arm movement.

Authors:  G L Gottlieb; Q Song; G L Almeida; D A Hong; D Corcos
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements.

Authors:  R A Andersen; L H Snyder; D C Bradley; J Xing
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. I. Spatial errors.

Authors:  J Gordon; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Brain control and information transfer.

Authors:  Edward J Tehovnik; Lewis L Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Coordination deficits in ideomotor apraxia during visually targeted reaching reflect impaired visuomotor transformations.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg; Kathleen Y Haaland
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Hemispheric specialization for movement control produces dissociable differences in online corrections after stroke.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Pratik K Mutha; Kathleen Y Haaland; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  Upper Limb Motor Impairment After Stroke.

Authors:  Preeti Raghavan
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 1.784

5.  The hand-reversal illusion revisited.

Authors:  Sang W Hong; Linda Xu; Min-Suk Kang; Frank Tong
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-26

6.  How Tilting the Head Interferes With Eye-Hand Coordination: The Role of Gravity in Visuo-Proprioceptive, Cross-Modal Sensory Transformations.

Authors:  Jules Bernard-Espina; Daniele Dal Canto; Mathieu Beraneck; Joseph McIntyre; Michele Tagliabue
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-10

7.  Enhanced Information Flow From Cerebellum to Secondary Visual Cortices Leads to Better Surgery Outcome in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Patients: A Stochastic Dynamic Causal Modeling Study With Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Rui Zhao; Yingchao Song; Xing Guo; Xiaotian Yang; Haoran Sun; Xukang Chen; Meng Liang; Yuan Xue
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Planning and adjustments for the control of reach extent in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Jill Campbell Stewart; James Gordon; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.262

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.