Literature DB >> 26608514

Relationship of diminished interjoint coordination after stroke to hand path consistency.

Geetanjali Gera1, Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira Freitas2, John Peter Scholz3,4.   

Abstract

Differences between 12 left-brain (LCVA, 65.4 ± 11.7 years old) and 10 right-brain (RCVA, 61 ± 12.1 years old) chronic stroke survivors and 10 age-matched control adults in coordinating specific joint motions of the arm to stabilize hand path when reaching to a central target were investigated in this study. The importance of coordinating joints to stabilize hand path was tested by comparing results from uncontrolled manifold (UCM) analysis performed on experimental data versus simulated data where the covariation (coordination) between particular joint motions was removed from the original data set. UCM analysis allowed estimation of the joint configuration variance magnitude that led to hand path variability (V ORT), where the extent of increase in V ORT after removing a joint's covariation indicated how well coordinated its motion actually was with those of the other joints. The more strongly coordinated a joint was with other joints, the greater effect removal of its covariance should have on indices of hand path stability. For the paretic arm of stroke survivors, simulated removal of a joint's covariation, mainly that of shoulder with elbow and wrist, led to less change in the magnitude of V ORT compared to the same arm of control subjects. These findings confirm a reduced ability of the motion of proximal joint from paretic arm to combine flexibly with motions of the distal joints to stabilize hand path.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hand path stability; Interjoint coordination; Reaching; Stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26608514     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4500-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  50 in total

1.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; D Kalakanis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  General coordination of shoulder, elbow and wrist dynamics during multijoint arm movements.

Authors:  James C Galloway; Gail F Koshland
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Determining the movements of the skeleton using well-configured markers.

Authors:  I Söderkvist; P A Wedin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke.

Authors:  M C Cirstea; M F Levin
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Effect of trunk restraint on the recovery of reaching movements in hemiparetic patients.

Authors:  S M Michaelsen; A Luta; A Roby-Brami; M F Levin
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Does hand dominance affect the use of motor abundance when reaching to uncertain targets?

Authors:  Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira Freitas; John Peter Scholz
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  Effects of unilateral brain damage on the control of goal-directed hand movements.

Authors:  C J Winstein; P S Pohl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Abnormal muscle coactivation patterns during isometric torque generation at the elbow and shoulder in hemiparetic subjects.

Authors:  J P Dewald; P S Pope; J D Given; T S Buchanan; W Z Rymer
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Aspects of joint coordination are preserved during pointing in persons with post-stroke hemiparesis.

Authors:  Darcy S Reisman; John P Scholz
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  5 in total

1.  Learning alternative movement coordination patterns using reinforcement feedback.

Authors:  Tzu-Hsiang Lin; Amber Denomme; Rajiv Ranganathan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Stability of steady hand force production explored across spaces and methods of analysis.

Authors:  Paulo B de Freitas; Sandra M S F Freitas; Mechelle M Lewis; Xuemei Huang; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Spasticity may obscure motor learning ability after stroke.

Authors:  Sandeep K Subramanian; Anatol G Feldman; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Quantifying Pathological Synergies in the Upper Extremity of Stroke Subjects With the Use of Inertial Measurement Units: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Miguel M C Bhagubai; Gerjan Wolterink; Anne Schwarz; Jeremia P O Held; Bert-Jan F Van Beijnum; Peter H Veltink
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.316

5.  Post-stroke kinematic analysis in rats reveals similar reaching abnormalities as humans.

Authors:  Gustavo Balbinot; Clarissa Pedrini Schuch; Matthew S Jeffers; Matthew W McDonald; Jessica M Livingston-Thomas; Dale Corbett
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.