Literature DB >> 18192046

Secondary neutrons in clinical proton radiotherapy: a charged issue.

David J Brenner1, Eric J Hall.   

Abstract

Hospital-based proton facilities may represent a major advance in radiation therapy, in part because of excellent dose distributions around the tumor, and in part because of the potentially lower whole-body dose compared with photon radiotherapy. Most current proton beams are spread out to cover the tumor using beam scattering and collimation techniques (passive scattering); this will necessarily result in an extra whole-body neutron dose, due to interactions of the protons with the scattering and collimating beam elements. However, the clinical significance of this whole-body low-dose neutron exposure has remained controversial. The number of proton facilities worldwide is increasing rapidly, and most of these facilities are/will be based on passive scattering. Thus it is important to assess and, ideally, minimize, the potential for second cancer induction by secondary neutrons. We discuss here the neutron doses involved, and the associated potential second cancer risks, with an emphasis on the uncertainties involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18192046     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  36 in total

Review 1.  Exploring two two-edged swords.

Authors:  David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  A parameter study of pencil beam proton dose distributions for the treatment of ocular melanoma utilizing spot scanning.

Authors:  Kenneth Sutherland; Satoshi Miyajima; Hiroyuki Date; Hiroki Shirato; Masayori Ishikawa; Masao Murakami; Mitsuru Yamagiwa; Paul Bolton; Toshiki Tajima
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2009-09-19

3.  Assessment of out-of-field absorbed dose and equivalent dose in proton fields.

Authors:  Ben Clasie; Andrew Wroe; Hanne Kooy; Nicolas Depauw; Jay Flanz; Harald Paganetti; Anatoly Rosenfeld
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Quality assurance evaluation of spot scanning beam proton therapy with an anthropomorphic prostate phantom.

Authors:  K Iqbal; M Gillin; P A Summers; S Dhanesar; K A Gifford; S A Buzdar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Evaluation of energy deposition and secondary particle production in proton therapy of brain using a slab head phantom.

Authors:  Sayyed Bijan Jia; Mohammad Hadi Hadizadeh; Ali Asghar Mowlavi; Mahdy Ebrahimi Loushab
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-05-01

6.  Can treatment of pediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma be improved by PET imaging and proton therapy?

Authors:  B Knäusl; C Lütgendorf-Caucig; J Hopfgartner; K Dieckmann; L Kurch; T Pelz; R Pötter; D Georg
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  A comparative study on the risk of second primary cancers in out-of-field organs associated with radiotherapy of localized prostate carcinoma using Monte Carlo-based accelerator and patient models.

Authors:  Bryan Bednarz; Basit Athar; X George Xu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Assessment of the risk for developing a second malignancy from scattered and secondary radiation in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  Reduction of the secondary neutron dose in passively scattered proton radiotherapy, using an optimized pre-collimator/collimator.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Carl D Elliston; Eric J Hall; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Charged particles in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.