Literature DB >> 12803966

Short-term reorganization of auditory analysis induced by phonetic experience.

Einat Liebenthal1, Jeffrey R Binder, Rebecca L Piorkowski, Robert E Remez.   

Abstract

Sine wave replicas of spoken words can be perceived both as nonphonetic auditory forms and as words, depending on a listener's experience. In this study, brain areas activated by sine wave words were studied with fMRI in two conditions: when subjects perceived the sounds spontaneously as nonphonetic auditory forms ("nïve condition") and after instruction and brief practice attending to their phonetic attributes ("informed condition"). The test items were composed such that half replicated natural words ("phonetic items") and the other half did not, because the tone analogs of the first and third formants had been temporally reversed ("nonphonetic items"). Subjects were asked to decide whether an isolated tone analog of the second formant (T2) presented before the sine wave word (T1234) was included in it. Experience in attending to the phonetic properties of the sinusoids interfered with this auditory matching task and was accompanied by a decrease in auditory cortex activation with word replicas but not with the acoustically matched nonphonetic items. Because the activation patterns elicited by equivalent acoustic test items depended on a listener's awareness of their phonetic potential, this indicates that the analysis of speech sounds in the auditory cortex is distinct from the simple resolution of auditory form, and is not a mere consequence of acoustic complexity. Because arbitrary acoustic patterns did not evoke the response observed for phonetic patterns, these findings suggest that the perception of speech is contingent on the presence of familiar patterns of spectral variation. The results are consistent with a short-term functional reorganization of auditory analysis induced by phonetic experience with sine wave replicas and contingent on the dynamic acoustic structure of speech.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12803966     DOI: 10.1162/089892903321662930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  19 in total

Review 1.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Neural circuits subserving the retrieval of stems and grammatical features in regular and irregular verbs.

Authors:  Ruth de Diego Balaguer; Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells; Michael Rotte; Jörg Bahlmann; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading.

Authors:  Cathy J Price
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Brainstem transcription of speech is disrupted in children with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Nicole Russo; Trent Nicol; Barbara Trommer; Steve Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-07

5.  Phonological universals constrain the processing of nonspeech stimuli.

Authors:  Iris Berent; Evan Balaban; Tracy Lennertz; Vered Vaknin-Nusbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2010-08

6.  A chimpanzee recognizes synthetic speech with significantly reduced acoustic cues to phonetic content.

Authors:  Lisa A Heimbauer; Michael J Beran; Michael J Owren
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  AUDITORY-PHONETIC PROJECTION AND LEXICAL STRUCTURE IN THE RECOGNITION OF SINE-WAVE WORDS.

Authors:  Robert E Remez; Kathryn R Dubowski; Robin S Broder; Morgana L Davids; Yael S Grossman; Marina Moskalenko; Jennifer S Pardo; Sara Maria Hasbun
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Left posterior temporal regions are sensitive to auditory categorization.

Authors:  Rutvik Desai; Einat Liebenthal; Eric Waldron; Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  A multisensory cortical network for understanding speech in noise.

Authors:  Christopher W Bishop; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Experience-dependent enhancement of linguistic pitch representation in the brainstem is not specific to a speech context.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.