Literature DB >> 17206582

An evolutionary cost of separate genders revealed by male-limited evolution.

N G Prasad1, S Bedhomme, T Day, A K Chippindale.   

Abstract

Theory predicts that intralocus sexual conflict can constrain the evolution of sexual dimorphism, preventing each sex from independently maximizing its fitness. To test this idea, we limited genome-wide gene expression to males in four replicate Drosophila melanogaster populations, removing female-specific selection. Over 25 generations, male fitness increased markedly, as sexually dimorphic traits evolved in the male direction. When male-evolved genomes were expressed in females, their fitness displayed a nearly symmetrical decrease. These results suggest that intralocus conflict strongly limits sex-specific adaptation, promoting the maintenance of genetic variation for fitness. Populations may carry a heavy genetic load as a result of selection for separate genders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17206582     DOI: 10.1086/509941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  47 in total

1.  Male-limited evolution suggests no extant intralocus sexual conflict over the sexually dimorphic cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Stéphanie Bedhomme; Adam K Chippindale; N G Prasad; Matthieu Delcourt; Jessica K Abbott; Martin A Mallet; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 2.  Gene duplication, tissue-specific gene expression and sexual conflict in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae).

Authors:  Richard H Baker; Apurva Narechania; Philip M Johns; Gerald S Wilkinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Stable linkage disequilibrium owing to sexual antagonism.

Authors:  Francisco Ubeda; David Haig; Manus M Patten
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Maternal inheritance, epigenetics and the evolution of polyandry.

Authors:  Jeanne A Zeh; David W Zeh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Patterns of quantitative genetic variation in multiple dimensions.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-08-10       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Sexual conflict and environmental change: trade-offs within and between the sexes during the evolution of desiccation resistance.

Authors:  Lucia Kwan; Stéphanie Bedhomme; N G Prasad; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

7.  Sexual conflict and the gender load: correlated evolution between population fitness and sexual dimorphism in seed beetles.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Midori Tuda
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Sex-biased gene expression and sexual conflict throughout development.

Authors:  Fiona C Ingleby; Ilona Flis; Edward H Morrow
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 9.  Genetic conflicts: the usual suspects and beyond.

Authors:  Richard N McLaughlin; Harmit S Malik
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Paolo Innocenti; Edward H Morrow
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.