Literature DB >> 22298707

A general population genetic framework for antagonistic selection that accounts for demography and recurrent mutation.

Tim Connallon1, Andrew G Clark.   

Abstract

Antagonistic selection--where alleles at a locus have opposing effects on male and female fitness ("sexual antagonism") or between components of fitness ("antagonistic pleiotropy")--might play an important role in maintaining population genetic variation and in driving phylogenetic and genomic patterns of sexual dimorphism and life-history evolution. While prior theory has thoroughly characterized the conditions necessary for antagonistic balancing selection to operate, we currently know little about the evolutionary interactions between antagonistic selection, recurrent mutation, and genetic drift, which should collectively shape empirical patterns of genetic variation. To fill this void, we developed and analyzed a series of population genetic models that simultaneously incorporate these processes. Our models identify two general properties of antagonistically selected loci. First, antagonistic selection inflates heterozygosity and fitness variance across a broad parameter range--a result that applies to alleles maintained by balancing selection and by recurrent mutation. Second, effective population size and genetic drift profoundly affect the statistical frequency distributions of antagonistically selected alleles. The "efficacy" of antagonistic selection (i.e., its tendency to dominate over genetic drift) is extremely weak relative to classical models, such as directional selection and overdominance. Alleles meeting traditional criteria for strong selection (N(e)s >> 1, where N(e) is the effective population size, and s is a selection coefficient for a given sex or fitness component) may nevertheless evolve as if neutral. The effects of mutation and demography may generate population differences in overall levels of antagonistic fitness variation, as well as molecular population genetic signatures of balancing selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22298707      PMCID: PMC3316657          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.137117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  84 in total

1.  Sex-limited mutations and the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  T Rhen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  The potential for sexually antagonistic polymorphism in different genome regions.

Authors:  Crispin Y Jordan; Deborah Charlesworth
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Genetic models of homosexuality: generating testable predictions.

Authors:  Sergey Gavrilets; William R Rice
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Population extinction and the genetics of adaptation.

Authors:  H Allen Orr; Robert L Unckless
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Effects of differential selection in the sexes on cytonuclear polymorphism and disequilibria.

Authors:  C S Babcock; M A Asmussen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genetic variation in a heterogeneous environment. I. Temporal heterogeneity and the absolute dominance model.

Authors:  P W Hedrick
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Heterozygous effects and frequency changes of lethal genes in populations.

Authors:  M Nei
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The frequency distribution of lethal chromosomes in finite populations.

Authors:  M Nei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1968-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Genetic architecture of fitness and nonfitness traits: empirical patterns and development of ideas.

Authors:  J Merilä; B C Sheldon
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  The coalescent process in models with selection and recombination.

Authors:  R R Hudson; N L Kaplan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  38 in total

1.  Models of frequency-dependent selection with mutation from parental alleles.

Authors:  Meredith V Trotter; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Life history trade-offs at a single locus maintain sexually selected genetic variation.

Authors:  Susan E Johnston; Jacob Gratten; Camillo Berenos; Jill G Pilkington; Tim H Clutton-Brock; Josephine M Pemberton; Jon Slate
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Sexual and parental antagonism shape genomic architecture.

Authors:  Manus M Patten; Francisco Ubeda; David Haig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Is sexual conflict an "engine of speciation"?

Authors:  Sergey Gavrilets
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  Sexual antagonism drives the displacement of polymorphism across gene regulatory cascades.

Authors:  Mark S Hill; Max Reuter; Alexander J Stewart
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Pleiotropy and life history evolution in Drosophila melanogaster: uncoupling life span and early fecundity.

Authors:  Aziz A Khazaeli; James W Curtsinger
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 6.053

7.  Signatures of sex-antagonistic selection on recombining sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Rafael F Guerrero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Balancing selection in species with separate sexes: insights from Fisher's geometric model.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Sexually antagonistic polymorphism in simultaneous hermaphrodites.

Authors:  Crispin Y Jordan; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Is the X chromosome a hot spot for sexually antagonistic polymorphisms? Biases in current empirical tests of classical theory.

Authors:  Filip Ruzicka; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.