Literature DB >> 20861046

Tokens improve capuchin performance in the reverse-reward contingency task.

Elsa Addessi1, Sabrina Rossi.   

Abstract

In humans and apes, one of the most adaptive functions of symbols is to inhibit strong behavioural predispositions. However, to our knowledge, no study has yet investigated whether using symbols provides some advantage to non-ape primates. We aimed to trace the evolutionary roots of symbolic competence by examining whether tokens improve performance in the reverse-reward contingency task in capuchin monkeys, which diverged from the human lineage approximately 35 Ma. Eight capuchins chose between: (i) two food quantities, (ii) two quantities of 'low-symbolic distance tokens' (each corresponding to one unit of food), and (iii) two 'high-symbolic distance tokens' (each corresponding to a different amount of food). In all conditions, subjects had to select the smaller quantity to obtain the larger reward. No procedural modifications were employed. Tokens did improve performance: five subjects succeeded with high-symbolic distance tokens, though only one succeeded with food, and none succeeded with low-symbolic distance tokens. Moreover, two of the five subjects transferred the rule to novel token combinations. Learning effects or preference reversals could not account for the successful performance with high-symbolic distance tokens. This is, to our knowledge, the first demonstration that tokens do allow monkeys to inhibit strong behavioural predispositions, as occurs in chimpanzees and children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20861046      PMCID: PMC3049048          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  22 in total

1.  Squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) choose smaller food arrays: long-term retention, choice with nonpreferred food, and transposition.

Authors:  James R Anderson; Shunji Awazu; Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.231

2.  How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed contingency task: the effects of food quantity and food visibility.

Authors:  Petra H J M Vlamings; Jana Uher; Josep Call
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-01

3.  Do capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) use tokens as symbols?

Authors:  E Addessi; L Crescimbene; E Visalberghi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Its own reward: lessons to be drawn from the reversed-reward contingency paradigm.

Authors:  Eran M Shifferman
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Rhesus monkeys with orbital prefrontal cortex lesions can learn to inhibit prepotent responses in the reversed reward contingency task.

Authors:  Y Chudasama; J D Kralik; E A Murray
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  What do Arabic numerals mean to macaques (Macaca mulatta)?

Authors:  Emily H Harris; Jonathan P Gulledge; Michael J Beran; David A Washburn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-01

7.  Mangabeys (Cercocebus torquatus lunulatus) solve the reverse contingency task without a modified procedure.

Authors:  Anna Albiach-Serrano; Federico Guillén-Salazar; Josep Call
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 8.  Symbolic representation of number in chimpanzees.

Authors:  Tetsuro Matsuzawa
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed reward contingency task II: transfer to new quantities, long-term retention, and the impact of quantity ratios.

Authors:  Jana Uher; Josep Call
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Preference transitivity and symbolic representation in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Elsa Addessi; Alessandra Mancini; Lara Crescimbene; Camillo Padoa-Schioppa; Elisabetta Visalberghi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  16 in total

1.  Lack of prosociality in great apes, capuchin monkeys and spider monkeys: convergent evidence from two different food distribution tasks.

Authors:  Federica Amici; Elisabetta Visalberghi; Josep Call
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Working and waiting for better rewards: self-control in two monkey species (Cebus apella and Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Theodore A Evans; Bonnie M Perdue; Audrey E Parrish; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Impact of stimulus format and reward value on quantity discrimination in capuchin and squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  Regina Paxton Gazes; Alison R Billas; Vanessa Schmitt
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) let lesser rewards pass them by to get better rewards.

Authors:  Jessica L Bramlett; Bonnie M Perdue; Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Chimpanzees can point to smaller amounts of food to accumulate larger amounts but they still fail the reverse-reward contingency task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Brielle T James; Will Whitham; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 2.478

Review 6.  The evolutionary roots of human decision making.

Authors:  Laurie R Santos; Alexandra G Rosati
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  Any reward will do: Effects of a reverse-reward contingency on size preference with pet dogs (Canis lupus familiaris).

Authors:  Jonathan K Fernand; Haleh Amanieh; David J Cox; Nicole R Dorey
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Abstraction promotes creative problem-solving in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  William W L Sampson; Sara A Khan; Eric J Nisenbaum; Jerald D Kralik
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-03-20

9.  Chimpanzees play the ultimatum game.

Authors:  Darby Proctor; Rebecca A Williamson; Frans B M de Waal; Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Primate cognition: attention, episodic memory, prospective memory, self-control, and metacognition as examples of cognitive control in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Charles R Menzel; Audrey E Parrish; Bonnie M Perdue; Ken Sayers; J David Smith; David A Washburn
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-06-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.