Literature DB >> 25559115

The evolutionary roots of human decision making.

Laurie R Santos1, Alexandra G Rosati.   

Abstract

Humans exhibit a suite of biases when making economic decisions. We review recent research on the origins of human decision making by examining whether similar choice biases are seen in nonhuman primates, our closest phylogenetic relatives. We propose that comparative studies can provide insight into four major questions about the nature of human choice biases that cannot be addressed by studies of our species alone. First, research with other primates can address the evolution of human choice biases and identify shared versus human-unique tendencies in decision making. Second, primate studies can constrain hypotheses about the psychological mechanisms underlying such biases. Third, comparisons of closely related species can identify when distinct mechanisms underlie related biases by examining evolutionary dissociations in choice strategies. Finally, comparative work can provide insight into the biological rationality of economically irrational preferences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bias; cognitive evolution; preference; primates; rationality

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25559115      PMCID: PMC4451179          DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol        ISSN: 0066-4308            Impact factor:   24.137


  117 in total

Review 1.  Delay of gratification in children.

Authors:  W Mischel; Y Shoda; M I Rodriguez
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Risk-sensitive neurons in macaque posterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Allison N McCoy; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-08-14       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Violations of transitivity under fitness maximization.

Authors:  Alasdair I Houston; John M McNamara; Mark D Steer
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 4.  Brain, emotion and decision making: the paradigmatic example of regret.

Authors:  Giorgio Coricelli; Raymond J Dolan; Angela Sirigu
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Neocortex size and behavioural ecology in primates.

Authors:  R A Barton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1996-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Mental models and counterfactual thoughts about what might have been.

Authors:  Ruth M.J. Byrne
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Rhesus monkeys lack a consistent peak-end effect.

Authors:  Eric R Xu; Emily J Knight; Jerald D Kralik
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Responses to a simple barter task in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 2.163

9.  Trading behavior between conspecifics in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  The evolutionary origins of human patience: temporal preferences in chimpanzees, bonobos, and human adults.

Authors:  Alexandra G Rosati; Jeffrey R Stevens; Brian Hare; Marc D Hauser
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  32 in total

1.  Human children but not chimpanzees make irrational decisions driven by social comparison.

Authors:  Esther Herrmann; Lou M Haux; Henriette Zeidler; Jan M Engelmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Why has evolution not selected for perfect self-control?

Authors:  Benjamin Y Hayden
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Gambling in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): The effect of cues signaling risky choice outcomes.

Authors:  Travis R Smith; Michael J Beran; Michael E Young
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Decision-making flexibility in New Caledonian crows, young children and adult humans in a multi-dimensional tool-use task.

Authors:  Rachael Miller; Romana Gruber; Anna Frohnwieser; Martina Schiestl; Sarah A Jelbert; Russell D Gray; Markus Boeckle; Alex H Taylor; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  New Caledonian crows' basic tool procurement is guided by heuristics, not matching or tracking probe site characteristics.

Authors:  Gavin R Hunt
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  On the Flexibility of Basic Risk Attitudes in Monkeys.

Authors:  Shiva Farashahi; Habiba Azab; Benjamin Hayden; Alireza Soltani
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  How animals do business.

Authors:  Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Bonobos and chimpanzees exhibit human-like framing effects.

Authors:  Christopher Krupenye; Alexandra G Rosati; Brian Hare
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 9.  Foraging for foundations in decision neuroscience: insights from ethology.

Authors:  Dean Mobbs; Pete C Trimmer; Daniel T Blumstein; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Spontaneous Metacognition in Rhesus Monkeys.

Authors:  Alexandra G Rosati; Laurie R Santos
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.