Literature DB >> 18489236

How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed reward contingency task II: transfer to new quantities, long-term retention, and the impact of quantity ratios.

Jana Uher1, Josep Call.   

Abstract

We tested 6 chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), 3 orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), 4 bonobos (Pan paniscus), and 2 gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) in the reversed reward contingency task. Individuals were presented with pairs of quantities ranging between 0 and 6 food items. Prior to testing, some experienced apes had solved this task using 2 quantities while others were totally naïve. Experienced apes transferred their ability to multiple-novel pairs after 6 to 19 months had elapsed since their initial testing. Two out of 6 naïve apes (1 chimpanzee, 1 bonobo) solved the task--a proportion comparable to that of a previous study using 2 pairs of quantities. Their acquisition speed was also comparable to the successful subjects from that study. The ratio between quantities explained a large portion of the variance but affected naïve and experienced individuals differently. For smaller ratios, naïve individuals were well below 50% correct and experienced ones were well above 50%, yet both groups tended to converge toward 50% for larger ratios. Thus, some apes require no procedural modifications to overcome their strong bias for selecting the larger of 2 quantities. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18489236     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  14 in total

1.  Social inhibitory control in five lemur species.

Authors:  Rachna B Reddy; Evan L MacLean; Aaron A Sandel; Brian Hare
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.163

2.  Tokens improve capuchin performance in the reverse-reward contingency task.

Authors:  Elsa Addessi; Sabrina Rossi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Chimpanzees can point to smaller amounts of food to accumulate larger amounts but they still fail the reverse-reward contingency task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Brielle T James; Will Whitham; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 2.478

Review 4.  The evolutionary roots of human decision making.

Authors:  Laurie R Santos; Alexandra G Rosati
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Evolutionary foundations of human prosocial sentiments.

Authors:  Joan B Silk; Bailey R House
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Can lemurs (Eulemur fulvus and E. macaco) use abstract representations of quantities to master the reverse-reward contingency task?

Authors:  Emilie Genty; Jean-Jacques Roeder
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 2.163

7.  Abstraction promotes creative problem-solving in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  William W L Sampson; Sara A Khan; Eric J Nisenbaum; Jerald D Kralik
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-03-20

8.  Adaptive numerical competency in a food-hoarding songbird.

Authors:  Simon Hunt; Jason Low; K C Burns
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Smoke and mirrors: Testing the scope of chimpanzees' appearance-reality understanding.

Authors:  Carla Krachun; Robert Lurz; Jamie L Russell; William D Hopkins
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-02-02

10.  Reaching around barriers: the performance of the great apes and 3-5-year-old children.

Authors:  Petra H J M Vlamings; Brian Hare; Josep Call
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.