Literature DB >> 27598059

Chimpanzees can point to smaller amounts of food to accumulate larger amounts but they still fail the reverse-reward contingency task.

Michael J Beran1, Brielle T James1, Will Whitham1, Audrey E Parrish1.   

Abstract

The reverse-reward contingency task presents 2 food sets to an animal, and they are required to choose the smaller of the 2 sets in order to receive the larger food set. Intriguingly, the majority of species tested on the reverse-reward task fail to learn this contingency in the absence of large trial counts, correction trials, and punishment techniques. The unique difficulty of this seemingly simple task likely reflects a failure of inhibitory control which is required to point toward a smaller and less desirable reward rather than a larger and more desirable reward. This failure by chimpanzees and other primates to pass the reverse-reward task is striking given the self-control they exhibit in a variety of other paradigms. For example, chimpanzees have consistently demonstrated a high capacity for delay of gratification in order to maximize accumulating food rewards in which foods are added item-by-item to a growing set until the subject consumes the rewards. To study the mechanisms underlying success in the accumulation task and failure in the reverse-reward task, we presented chimpanzees with several combinations of these 2 tasks to determine when chimpanzees might succeed in pointing to smaller food sets over larger food sets and how the nature of the task might determine the animals' success or failure. Across experiments, 3 chimpanzees repeatedly failed to solve the reverse-reward task, whereas they accumulated nearly all food items across all instances of the accumulation self-control task, even when they had to point to small amounts of food to accumulate larger amounts. These data indicate that constraints of these 2 related but still different tasks of behavioral inhibition are dependent upon the animals' perceptions of the choice set, their sense of control over the contents of choice sets, and the nature of the task constraints. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27598059      PMCID: PMC5061628          DOI: 10.1037/xan0000115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn        ISSN: 2329-8456            Impact factor:   2.478


  35 in total

1.  Squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) choose smaller food arrays: long-term retention, choice with nonpreferred food, and transposition.

Authors:  James R Anderson; Shunji Awazu; Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.231

2.  How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed contingency task: the effects of food quantity and food visibility.

Authors:  Petra H J M Vlamings; Jana Uher; Josep Call
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-01

Review 3.  The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans?

Authors:  Thomas Suddendorf; Michael C Corballis
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 4.  Its own reward: lessons to be drawn from the reversed-reward contingency paradigm.

Authors:  Eran M Shifferman
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Spontaneous use of magnitude discrimination and ordination by the orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus).

Authors:  R W Shumaker; A M Palkovich; B B Beck; G A Guagnano; H Morowitz
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  Mangabeys (Cercocebus torquatus lunulatus) solve the reverse contingency task without a modified procedure.

Authors:  Anna Albiach-Serrano; Federico Guillén-Salazar; Josep Call
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Navigating two-dimensional mazes: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and capuchins (Cebus apella sp.) profit from experience differently.

Authors:  Dorothy M Fragaszy; Erica Kennedy; Aeneas Murnane; Charles Menzel; Gene Brewer; Julie Johnson-Pynn; William Hopkins
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 8.  The comparative study of mental time travel.

Authors:  William A Roberts; Miranda C Feeney
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed reward contingency task II: transfer to new quantities, long-term retention, and the impact of quantity ratios.

Authors:  Jana Uher; Josep Call
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) anticipation of food return: coping with waiting time in an exchange task.

Authors:  V Dufour; M Pelé; E H M Sterck; B Thierry
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.231

View more
  1 in total

1.  Abstraction promotes creative problem-solving in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  William W L Sampson; Sara A Khan; Eric J Nisenbaum; Jerald D Kralik
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-03-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.