Literature DB >> 24412729

Working and waiting for better rewards: self-control in two monkey species (Cebus apella and Macaca mulatta).

Theodore A Evans1, Bonnie M Perdue2, Audrey E Parrish3, Michael J Beran2.   

Abstract

Self-control is typically defined as choosing a greater, delayed reward over a lesser, more immediate reward. However, in nature, there are other costs besides delay associated with obtaining the greatest outcome including increased effort, potential punishment, and low probability of reward. Effort is an interesting case because it sometimes impairs self-control, by acting as an additional cost, and at other times facilitates self-control, by distracting one from impulsive options. Additionally, different species may perform differently in effortful self-control tasks, based on their natural ecology. To gain insight into these aspects of self-control behavior, we examined capuchin monkeys' and rhesus monkeys' self-control in separate working and waiting choice tasks. We hypothesized that capuchins would show greater self-control in the working task, given their naturally higher activity level, whereas rhesus would perform similarly in both tasks. Rhesus performed as predicted, whereas contrary to our hypothesis, capuchins exhibited lesser performance in the working task. Nonetheless, these results may still stem from inherent species differences interacting with details of the methodology. Capuchins, being highly energetic and social monkeys, may have divided their energy and attention between the working task and other elements of the test environment such as visible group mates or manipulanda.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Capuchin monkey; Delay; Effort; Rhesus monkey; Self-control

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24412729      PMCID: PMC3972310          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  42 in total

1.  How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed contingency task: the effects of food quantity and food visibility.

Authors:  Petra H J M Vlamings; Jana Uher; Josep Call
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-01

Review 2.  Intertemporal choice--toward an integrative framework.

Authors:  Gregory S Berns; David Laibson; George Loewenstein
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Fission-fusion dynamics, behavioral flexibility, and inhibitory control in primates.

Authors:  Federica Amici; Filippo Aureli; Josep Call
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Delaying gratification for food and tokens in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): when quantity is salient, symbolic stimuli do not improve performance.

Authors:  T A Evans; M J Beran; F Paglieri; E Addessi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  The hybrid delay task: can capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) sustain a delay after an initial choice to do so?

Authors:  Fabio Paglieri; Valentina Focaroli; Jessica Bramlett; Valeria Tierno; Joseph M McIntyre; Elsa Addessi; Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Delay choice versus delay maintenance: different measures of delayed gratification in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Elsa Addessi; Fabio Paglieri; Michael J Beran; Theodore A Evans; Luigi Macchitella; Francesca De Petrillo; Valentina Focaroli
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Waiting for rewards and punishments: effects of time and probability on choice.

Authors:  W Mischel; J Grusec
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1967-01

8.  The evolutionary origins of human patience: temporal preferences in chimpanzees, bonobos, and human adults.

Authors:  Alexandra G Rosati; Jeffrey R Stevens; Brian Hare; Marc D Hauser
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Predictors of adult humans' self-control and impulsiveness for food reinforcers.

Authors:  L B Forzano; A W Logue
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.868

10.  The evolution of "egalitarian" and "despotic" social systems among macaques.

Authors:  S Matsumura
Journal:  Primates       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.781

View more
  8 in total

1.  Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) exhibit the decoy effect in a perceptual discrimination task.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Exploring Potential Mechanisms Underlying the Lack of Uncertainty Monitoring in Capuchin Monkeys.

Authors:  Bonnie M Perdue; Barbara A Church; J David Smith; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Int J Comp Psychol       Date:  2015

3.  Looking ahead? Computerized maze task performance by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella), and human children (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Audrey E Parrish; Sara E Futch; Theodore A Evans; Bonnie M Perdue
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  Self-control assessments of capuchin monkeys with the rotating tray task and the accumulation task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; Mattea S Rossettie; Brielle T James; Will Whitham; Bradlyn Walker; Sara E Futch; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Social inhibition and behavioural flexibility when the context changes: a comparison across six primate species.

Authors:  Federica Amici; Josep Call; Julia Watzek; Sarah Brosnan; Filippo Aureli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  What Is the Relationship between Dopamine and Effort?

Authors:  Mark E Walton; Sebastien Bouret
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  Motor self-regulation in goats (Capra aegagrus hircus) in a detour-reaching task.

Authors:  Jan Langbein
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Endogenous cortisol correlates with performance under pressure on a working memory task in capuchin monkeys.

Authors:  Meghan J Sosnowski; Marcela E Benítez; Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.