Literature DB >> 20856155

Correlation of early auditory potentials and intracochlear electrode insertion properties: an animal model featuring near real-time monitoring.

Adam P Campbell1, Thomas A Suberman, Craig A Buchman, Douglas C Fitzpatrick, Oliver F Adunka.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this work was to assess electrophysiologic response changes to acoustic stimuli as an intracochlear electrode impacted cochlear structures in an animal model of hearing preservation cochlear implantation. The ultimate goal is to develop efficient procedures for assessing the status of cochlear physiology for intraoperative use.
METHODS: Sixteen gerbils and 18 ears were tested. A rigid electrode was inserted through a basal turn cochleostomy and directed toward the basilar membrane/osseous spiral lamina complex. We recorded acoustically evoked early auditory potentials including cochlear microphonics (CMs) and compound action potentials (CAPs) to a short stimulation sequence consisting of one stimulus frequency and intensity as the electrode was advanced. A microendoscope was used to visualize the electrode insertion progress and to identify the site of electrode impact. After each experiment, the site of intracochlear trauma was confirmed using whole mount preparations.
RESULTS: Electrophysiologic changes correlated well with the degree and location of trauma. We observed four distinct patterns. In addition, the endoscope in conjunction with the short recording sequence allowed for the detection of response changes that were reversible when the electrode was retracted. These cases were associated with less than full-thickness damage on histology.
CONCLUSION: The short recording sequence to obtain acoustically evoked intracochlear potentials and the microendoscope allowed us to detect various levels of cochlear trauma including minor and reversible damage. Recordings of this type are potentially available using current implant technology. Future improvements in the measurements can be expected to improve the efficiency of the recording paradigm to produce a clinically useful tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20856155      PMCID: PMC3051407          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181f6c899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  22 in total

1.  Cochlear fluid space dimensions for six species derived from reconstructions of three-dimensional magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  M Thorne; A N Salt; J E DeMott; M M Henson; O W Henson; S L Gewalt
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Jan Kiefer; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Wolfgang Baumgartner; Stephan Marcel Pok; Jochen Tillein; Qing Ye; Christoph von Ilberg
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.494

3.  Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. New technology for severe hearing loss.

Authors:  C von Ilberg; J Kiefer; J Tillein; T Pfenningdorff; R Hartmann; E Stürzebecher; R Klinke
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.538

4.  Intracochlear recordings of electrophysiological parameters indicating cochlear damage.

Authors:  Oliver F Adunka; Stefan Mlot; Thomas A Suberman; Adam P Campbell; Joshua Surowitz; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  The cochlear place-frequency map of the adult and developing Mongolian gerbil.

Authors:  M Müller
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Preservation of basal inner ear structures in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Oliver Adunka; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Markus Hambek; Marc H Unkelbach; Andreas Radeloff; Jan Kiefer
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.538

7.  A new method of partial deafness treatment.

Authors:  Henryk Skarzyński; Artur Lorens; Anna Piotrowska
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2003-04

8.  Pattern of hearing loss in a rat model of cochlear implantation trauma.

Authors:  Adrien A Eshraghi; Marek Polak; Jiao He; Fred F Telischi; Thomas J Balkany; Thomas R Van De Water
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Development and evaluation of an improved cochlear implant electrode design for electric acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Oliver Adunka; Jan Kiefer; Marc H Unkelbach; Thomas Lehnert; Wolfgang Gstoettner
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Christopher Turner
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.494

View more
  10 in total

1.  [Aspects of inner ear trauma in CI treatment].

Authors:  T Klenzner
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Electrophysiological properties of cochlear implantation in the gerbil using a flexible array.

Authors:  Christine DeMason; Baishakhi Choudhury; Faisal Ahmad; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Jacob Wang; Craig A Buchman; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Intracochlear Electrocochleography: Influence of Scalar Position of the Cochlear Implant Electrode on Postinsertion Results.

Authors:  William J Riggs; Robert T Dwyer; Jourdan T Holder; Jameson K Mattingly; Amanda Ortmann; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Carla V Valenzuela; Brendan P O'Connell; Michael S Harris; Leonid M Litvak; Kanthaiah Koka; Craig A Buchman; Robert F Labadie; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  A gerbil model of sloping sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Thomas A Suberman; Adam P Campbell; Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman; Joseph P Roche; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Detection of intracochlear damage during cochlear implant electrode insertion using extracochlear measurements in the gerbil.

Authors:  Faisal I Ahmad; Baishakhi Choudhury; Christine E De Mason; Oliver F Adunka; Charles C Finley; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Round window electrocochleography before and after cochlear implant electrode insertion.

Authors:  Oliver F Adunka; Christopher K Giardina; Eric J Formeister; Baishakhi Choudhury; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Electrophysiologic consequences of flexible electrode insertions in gerbils with noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Baishakhi Choudhury; Oliver Franz Adunka; Omar Awan; John Maxwell Pike; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 8.  Electrocochleography in cochlear implantation: Development, applications, and future directions.

Authors:  Jason H Barnes; Linda X Yin; Aniket A Saoji; Matthew L Carlson
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-06-04

9.  Assessment of Cochlear Function during Cochlear Implantation by Extra- and Intracochlear Electrocochleography.

Authors:  Adrian Dalbert; Flurin Pfiffner; Marco Hoesli; Kanthaiah Koka; Dorothe Veraguth; Christof Roosli; Alexander Huber
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Cochlear implantation in an animal model documents cochlear damage at the tip of the implant.

Authors:  José Santos Cruz de Andrade; Peter Baumhoff; Oswaldo Laércio Mendonça Cruz; Thomas Lenarz; Andrej Kral
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.