Literature DB >> 15668529

Preservation of basal inner ear structures in cochlear implantation.

Oliver Adunka1, Wolfgang Gstoettner, Markus Hambek, Marc H Unkelbach, Andreas Radeloff, Jan Kiefer.   

Abstract

The aim of this report was to examine basal trauma in implanted human temporal bones and discuss modified approaches to the basal cochlear turn to avoid destruction of basal cochlear structures. Thirty-three human temporal bones were implanted with four different cochlear implant electrode arrays manufactured by MED-EL using either a caudal approach cochleostomy or round window membrane insertions. All specimens were processed with a special histological technique that allows sectioning of undecalcified bone with the electrode in situ. All bones were evaluated histologically in terms of basal cochlear trauma. Two pathomechanisms of basal trauma could be distinguished and were evaluated separately, buckling of the basal end of the array and trauma by drilling. Using the caudal approach cochleostomy, the total percentage of destructive basal trauma was 48% compared to less than 15% when performing round window membrane insertions. Although it is still unclear whether basal cochlear trauma influences apical cochlear function or not, adapted surgical procedures and no forceful insertion maneuvers should be used when performing cochlear implantations with hearing preservation. Copyright (c) 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15668529     DOI: 10.1159/000081887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec        ISSN: 0301-1569            Impact factor:   1.538


  22 in total

1.  Impact of the surgical experience on cochleostomy location: a comparative temporal bone study between endaural and posterior tympanotomy approaches for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Clair Vandersteen; Thomas Demarcy; Coralie Roger; Eric Fontas; Charles Raffaelli; Nicholas Ayache; Hervé Delingette; Nicolas Guevara
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Soft cochlear implantation: rationale for the surgical approach.

Authors:  David R Friedland; Christina Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

3.  An automated insertion tool for cochlear implants: another step towards atraumatic cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  Andreas Hussong; Thomas S Rau; Tobias Ortmaier; Bodo Heimann; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Radiologic and functional evaluation of electrode dislocation from the scala tympani to the scala vestibuli in patients with cochlear implants.

Authors:  N Fischer; L Pinggera; V Weichbold; D Dejaco; J Schmutzhard; G Widmann
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Intracochlear recordings of electrophysiological parameters indicating cochlear damage.

Authors:  Oliver F Adunka; Stefan Mlot; Thomas A Suberman; Adam P Campbell; Joshua Surowitz; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Flexible cochlear microendoscopy in the gerbil.

Authors:  Adam P Campbell; Thomas A Suberman; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  [Hearing preservation in children with electric-acoustic stimulation after cochlear implantation : Outcome after electrode insertion with minimal insertion trauma (German version)].

Authors:  T Rader; A Bohnert; C Matthias; D Koutsimpelas; M-A Kainz; S Strieth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Correlation of early auditory potentials and intracochlear electrode insertion properties: an animal model featuring near real-time monitoring.

Authors:  Adam P Campbell; Thomas A Suberman; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Viral D Tejani; Julia K Omtvedt; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Jacob J Oleson; Marie V Ozanne
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Optimal cochlear implant insertion vectors.

Authors:  Xenia Meshik; Timothy A Holden; Richard A Chole; Timothy E Hullar
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.