Literature DB >> 22252968

Detection of intracochlear damage during cochlear implant electrode insertion using extracochlear measurements in the gerbil.

Faisal I Ahmad1, Baishakhi Choudhury, Christine E De Mason, Oliver F Adunka, Charles C Finley, Douglas C Fitzpatrick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: An intraoperative monitoring algorithm during cochlear implant electrode insertion could be used to detect trauma and guide electrode placement relative to surviving hair cells. The aim of this report was to assess the feasibility of using extracochlear recording sites to monitor acoustically evoked responses from surviving hair cells and neural elements during implantation in an animal model. STUDY
DESIGN: Animal experiments.
METHODS: The normal-hearing gerbil was used. Two recording methods, one using a lock-in amplifier and another using Fourier analysis of recorded signals, were used to obtain frequency-specific information about the responses to tones. Amplitude and threshold determinations were made at the round window and at three extracochlear sites. To induce intracochlear damage, a platinum-iridium wire was inserted through the round window. The wire was advanced, and changes in the potentials were correlated with cochlear contact. Anatomic integrity was assessed using cochlea whole mount preparations.
RESULTS: In general, the lock-in amplifier showed greater sensitivity and lower thresholds at higher frequencies relative to the Fourier method. Also, the lock-in amplifier was more resistant to masking effects. Both systems were able to detect loss of cochlear potentials secondary to intracochlear trauma. Histologic damage was seen in all cases and corresponded to electrophysiologic changes.
CONCLUSIONS: Impact of electrodes on cochlear structures affecting cochlear performance could be detected from several extracochlear sites. The lock-in amplifier demonstrated greater sensitivity and resistance to noise when compared to the fast Fourier transform recording paradigm. The latter showed greater flexibility of detecting and separating hair cell and neural potentials.
Copyright © 2011 The American Laryngological, Rhinological, and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22252968      PMCID: PMC3358795          DOI: 10.1002/lary.22488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  13 in total

1.  Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Christopher Turner; Kate E Gfeller; Mary W Lowder
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults.

Authors:  Antje Aschendorff; Jan Kromeier; Thomas Klenzner; Roland Laszig
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Effects of hearing preservation on psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Stephen Y Kang; Deborah J Colesa; Donald L Swiderski; Gina L Su; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-10

Review 4.  Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: a review of the first decade.

Authors:  Christoph A von Ilberg; Uwe Baumann; Jan Kiefer; Jochen Tillein; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Intracochlear recordings of electrophysiological parameters indicating cochlear damage.

Authors:  Oliver F Adunka; Stefan Mlot; Thomas A Suberman; Adam P Campbell; Joshua Surowitz; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Flexible cochlear microendoscopy in the gerbil.

Authors:  Adam P Campbell; Thomas A Suberman; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Correlation of early auditory potentials and intracochlear electrode insertion properties: an animal model featuring near real-time monitoring.

Authors:  Adam P Campbell; Thomas A Suberman; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.

Authors:  Bernard Fraysse; Angel Ramos Macías; Olivier Sterkers; Sandro Burdo; Richard Ramsden; Olivier Deguine; Thomas Klenzner; Thomas Lenarz; Manuel Manrique Rodriguez; Ernst Von Wallenberg; Chris James
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  In vivo estimates of the position of advanced bionics electrode arrays in the human cochlea.

Authors:  Margaret W Skinner; Timothy A Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Arne H Voie; Barry Brunsden; J Gail Neely; Eugene A Saxon; Timothy E Hullar; Charles C Finley
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2007-04

10.  Response characteristics in the apex of the gerbil cochlea studied through auditory nerve recordings.

Authors:  Corstiaen P C Versteegh; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-01-07
View more
  4 in total

1.  A cool approach to reducing electrode-induced trauma: Localized therapeutic hypothermia conserves residual hearing in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ilmar Tamames; Curtis King; Esperanza Bas; W Dalton Dietrich; Fred Telischi; Suhrud M Rajguru
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Intracochlear Electrocochleography: Response Patterns During Cochlear Implantation and Hearing Preservation.

Authors:  Christopher K Giardina; Kevin D Brown; Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman; Kendall A Hutson; Harold C Pillsbury; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Light sheet microscopy of the gerbil cochlea.

Authors:  Kendall A Hutson; Stephen H Pulver; Pablo Ariel; Caroline Naso; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Assessment of Cochlear Function during Cochlear Implantation by Extra- and Intracochlear Electrocochleography.

Authors:  Adrian Dalbert; Flurin Pfiffner; Marco Hoesli; Kanthaiah Koka; Dorothe Veraguth; Christof Roosli; Alexander Huber
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 4.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.