Literature DB >> 23988997

Electrophysiologic consequences of flexible electrode insertions in gerbils with noise-induced hearing loss.

Baishakhi Choudhury1, Oliver Franz Adunka, Omar Awan, John Maxwell Pike, Craig A Buchman, Douglas C Fitzpatrick.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Flexible electrode interaction with intracochlear structures in a noise-damaged region of the cochlea can lead to measureable electrophysiologic changes.
BACKGROUND: An emerging goal in cochlear implantation is preservation of residual hearing subsequently allowing for combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS). However, residual hearing is at least partially lost in most patients as a result of electrode insertion. A gerbil model was used to examine changes to acoustically evoked cochlear potentials during simulated cochlear implantation.
METHODS: Gerbils were partially deafened by noise exposure to mimic residual hearing in human cochlear implant candidates. After 1 month, round window and intracochlear recordings during flexible electrode insertion were made in response to 1 kHz tone burst stimuli at 80 dB SPL. After the insertion, the cochleas were histologically examined for hair cell loss because of the noise exposure and trauma because of the electrode insertion.
RESULTS: Anatomic damage from the flexible electrode was not observable in most cases. However, insertions caused response declines that were, on average, greater than the controls, although some losses were similar to the controls. The CM was more sensitive than the CAP for detecting cochlear disturbance.
CONCLUSION: Because response reductions occurred in the absence of anatomic damage, disturbances in the fluid at the base appear to affect responses from the apex. The losses were less than in previous experiments where the basilar membrane was penetrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23988997      PMCID: PMC4378530          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31829bdf2b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  17 in total

1.  Electrocochleography during cochlear implantation for hearing preservation.

Authors:  Marco Mandalà; Liliana Colletti; Giovanni Tonoli; Vittorio Colletti
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Intraoperative monitoring using cochlear microphonics in cochlear implant patients with residual hearing.

Authors:  Andreas Radeloff; Wafaa Shehata-Dieler; Agmal Scherzed; Kristen Rak; Wilma Harnisch; Rudolf Hagen; Robert Mlynski
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. New technology for severe hearing loss.

Authors:  C von Ilberg; J Kiefer; J Tillein; T Pfenningdorff; R Hartmann; E Stürzebecher; R Klinke
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.538

4.  Electrophysiological properties of cochlear implantation in the gerbil using a flexible array.

Authors:  Christine DeMason; Baishakhi Choudhury; Faisal Ahmad; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Jacob Wang; Craig A Buchman; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Intracochlear recordings of electrophysiological parameters indicating cochlear damage.

Authors:  Oliver F Adunka; Stefan Mlot; Thomas A Suberman; Adam P Campbell; Joshua Surowitz; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Detection of intracochlear damage with cochlear implantation in a gerbil model of hearing loss.

Authors:  Baishakhi Choudhury; Oliver Franz Adunka; Christine E Demason; Faisal I Ahmad; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Flexible cochlear microendoscopy in the gerbil.

Authors:  Adam P Campbell; Thomas A Suberman; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Correlation of early auditory potentials and intracochlear electrode insertion properties: an animal model featuring near real-time monitoring.

Authors:  Adam P Campbell; Thomas A Suberman; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  A gerbil model of sloping sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Thomas A Suberman; Adam P Campbell; Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman; Joseph P Roche; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Intraoperative round window recordings to acoustic stimuli from cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Baishakhi Choudhury; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Craig A Buchman; Benjamin P Wei; Margaret T Dillon; Shuman He; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  6 in total

1.  The Compound Action Potential in Subjects Receiving a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  William C Scott; Christopher K Giardina; Andrew K Pappa; Tatyana E Fontenot; Meredith L Anderson; Margaret T Dillon; Kevin D Brown; Harold C Pillsbury; Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Distinguishing hair cell from neural potentials recorded at the round window.

Authors:  Mathieu Forgues; Heather A Koehn; Askia K Dunnon; Stephen H Pulver; Craig A Buchman; Oliver F Adunka; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Effect of a liposomal hyaluronic acid gel loaded with dexamethasone in a guinea pig model after manual or motorized cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Elisabeth Mamelle; Naila El Kechai; Benjamin Granger; Olivier Sterkers; Amélie Bochot; Florence Agnely; Evelyne Ferrary; Yann Nguyen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Assessment of Cochlear Function during Cochlear Implantation by Extra- and Intracochlear Electrocochleography.

Authors:  Adrian Dalbert; Flurin Pfiffner; Marco Hoesli; Kanthaiah Koka; Dorothe Veraguth; Christof Roosli; Alexander Huber
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Cochlear implantation in an animal model documents cochlear damage at the tip of the implant.

Authors:  José Santos Cruz de Andrade; Peter Baumhoff; Oswaldo Laércio Mendonça Cruz; Thomas Lenarz; Andrej Kral
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-20

6.  Effects of intraoperatively applied glucocorticoid hydrogels on residual hearing and foreign body reaction in a guinea pig model of cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Clemens Honeder; Lukas David Landegger; Elisabeth Engleder; Franz Gabor; Roberto Plasenzotti; Hanns Plenk; Alexandra Kaider; Lena Hirtler; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Christoph Arnoldner
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 1.494

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.