Literature DB >> 15891647

Pattern of hearing loss in a rat model of cochlear implantation trauma.

Adrien A Eshraghi1, Marek Polak, Jiao He, Fred F Telischi, Thomas J Balkany, Thomas R Van De Water.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Trauma caused by cochlear implant electrode insertion is attributable to the combination of direct physical trauma and the delayed cell death of oxidative stress-injured auditory sensory cells.
BACKGROUND: Histologic evaluation of cochlear implant electrode trauma has demonstrated that the extent of sensory cell losses is proportional to the degree of injury. However, the impact of delayed oxidative stress within injured cochlear tissues and the progressive loss of injured hair cells by way of apoptosis are at present unknown.
METHODS: Laboratory rats were evaluated for hearing acuity before and after electrode insertion, before and after round window membrane incision only. Hearing was measured before trauma or incision and over the next 7 days. Objective measurements of hearing function were distortion products of otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in the frequency range of 2 to 32 kHz and tone-burst (i.e., 4-32 kHz) evoked auditory brain stem responses (ABRs).
RESULTS: For the experimental cochleae, there were progressive increases in ABR thresholds and decreases in ABR amplitudes. The amplitude of the DPOAEs in the experimental cochleae also showed progressive decreases. For the contralateral control and round window membrane surgical control ears, there were no significant changes in either DPOAE or ABR thresholds.
CONCLUSION: These results document a progressive loss of hearing acuity postimplantation and strongly suggest that electrode insertion trauma generated oxidative stress within injured cochlear tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15891647     DOI: 10.1097/01.mao.0000169791.53201.e1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  21 in total

Review 1.  Soft cochlear implantation: rationale for the surgical approach.

Authors:  David R Friedland; Christina Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

2.  Effects of hearing preservation on psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Stephen Y Kang; Deborah J Colesa; Donald L Swiderski; Gina L Su; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-10

3.  Pattern of hearing loss following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Eyal Raveh; Joseph Attias; Benny Nageris; Liora Kornreich; David Ulanovski
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Factors associated with hearing loss in a normal-hearing guinea pig model of Hybrid cochlear implants.

Authors:  Chiemi Tanaka; Anh Nguyen-Huynh; Katherine Loera; Gemaine Stark; Lina Reiss
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Intracochlear recordings of electrophysiological parameters indicating cochlear damage.

Authors:  Oliver F Adunka; Stefan Mlot; Thomas A Suberman; Adam P Campbell; Joshua Surowitz; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Implications of minimizing trauma during conventional cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Matthew L Carlson; Colin L W Driscoll; René H Gifford; Geoffrey J Service; Nicole M Tombers; Becky J Hughes-Borst; Brian A Neff; Charles W Beatty
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  A Preliminary Investigation of the Air-Bone Gap: Changes in Intracochlear Sound Pressure With Air- and Bone-conducted Stimuli After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; Jameson K Mattingly; Nathaniel T Greene; Herman A Jenkins; Stephen P Cass; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 8.  The cochlear implant: historical aspects and future prospects.

Authors:  Adrien A Eshraghi; Ronen Nazarian; Fred F Telischi; Suhrud M Rajguru; Eric Truy; Chhavi Gupta
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 2.064

9.  Cochlear Implant Electrode Effect on Sound Energy Transfer Within the Cochlea During Acoustic Stimulation.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Greene; Jameson K Mattingly; Herman A Jenkins; Daniel J Tollin; James R Easter; Stephen P Cass
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  A cool approach to reducing electrode-induced trauma: Localized therapeutic hypothermia conserves residual hearing in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ilmar Tamames; Curtis King; Esperanza Bas; W Dalton Dietrich; Fred Telischi; Suhrud M Rajguru
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.