Literature DB >> 20844940

Training the Millennial learner through experiential evolutionary scaffolding: implications for clinical supervision in graduate education programs.

Vickie L Venne1, Darrell Coleman.   

Abstract

They are the Millennials--Generation Y. Over the next few decades, they will be entering genetic counseling graduate training programs and the workforce. As a group, they are unlike previous youth generations in many ways, including the way they learn. Therefore, genetic counselors who teach and supervise need to understand the Millennials and explore new ways of teaching to ensure that the next cohort of genetic counselors has both skills and knowledge to represent our profession well. This paper will summarize the distinguishing traits of the Millennial generation as well as authentic learning and evolutionary scaffolding theories of learning that can enhance teaching and supervision. We will then use specific aspects of case preparation during clinical rotations to demonstrate how incorporating authentic learning theory into evolutionary scaffolding results in experiential evolutionary scaffolding, a method that potentially offers a more effective approach when teaching Millennials. We conclude with suggestions for future research.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20844940     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-010-9319-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  16 in total

Review 1.  Generational diversity: teaching and learning approaches.

Authors:  Susan A Johnson; Mary L Romanello
Journal:  Nurse Educ       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.082

2.  Comparing millennial and generation X medical students at one medical school.

Authors:  Nicole J Borges; R Stephen Manuel; Carol L Elam; Bonnie J Jones
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 3.  Educating a new generation: teaching baby boomer faculty about millennial students.

Authors:  Kara Mangold
Journal:  Nurse Educ       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.082

4.  Generational (age) differences in nursing students' preferences for teaching methods.

Authors:  Jean T Walker; Tina Martin; Jill White; Rowena Elliott; Anne Norwood; Carl Mangum; Lisa Haynie
Journal:  J Nurs Educ       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.726

5.  The "millennials": first year in practice.

Authors:  Marianne E Olson
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.250

Review 6.  Genes and inheritance.

Authors:  L A Middelton; K F Peters; E A Helmbold
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.592

7.  A Survey of Clinical Supervision in Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Heidi L Lindh; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Korinne Cikanek; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  A Qualitative Investigation of Student and Supervisor Perceptions of Live Supervision in Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Susan M Hendrickson; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Supervision for Practicing Genetic Counselors: An Overview of Models.

Authors:  A L Kennedy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Problem-based learning: a review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues.

Authors:  M A Albanese; S Mitchell
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.893

View more
  2 in total

1.  Genetic Counseling Milestones: A Framework for Student Competency Evaluation.

Authors:  Carrie Guy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Effects of Anxiety on Novice Genetic Counseling Students' Experience of Supervised Clinical Rotations.

Authors:  Ian M MacFarlane; Pat McCarthy Veach; Janelle E Grier; Derek J Meister; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.537

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.