Literature DB >> 28360501

Can TAD and CalTAD predict cut-out after extra-medullary fixation with new generation devices of proximal femoral fractures? A retrospective study.

Gaetano Caruso1, Mattia Andreotti1, Carlotta Pari1, Francesco Soldati1, Alessandro Gildone1, Vincenzo Lorusso1, Leo Massari1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intramedullary and extramedullary strategies of pertrochanteric fracture fixation are still controversial, but new percutaneous devices may give advantages regarding operative time, blood loss and rate of cardiovascular complications. We retrospectively analyze our cases regarding Anteversa® plate (Intrauma, Turin, Italy) fixation of pertrochanteric femoral fractures, focusing on the correlation between two radiographical parameters (tip-apex distance "TAD" and calcar referenced tip-apex distance "CalTAD") and the occurrence of cut-out. The purpose of this study was to determine if these predicting factors of cut-out are reliable in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures with the Anteversa plate.
METHODS: A series of 77 patients with 53 31-A1 fracture types and 24-A2 fractures completed a 12-month-follow-up. Clinical outcomes were evaluated according to Parker-Palmer Mobility Score at the final follow-up. TAD and CalTAD were considered to determine their correlation with cut-out events.
RESULTS: The mean Parker-Palmer Score was 6.94 in A1 group and 7.41 in A2 group (p = 0.47). Mean value of TAD index was 29.58, 29.81 in the A1 group and 29.08 in the A2 group, and mean value of CalTAD index was 30.87, 31.03 in the A1 group and 30.50 in the A2 group. We observed 3 cases of implant cut-out. We shared our sample in two groups, one group with TAD and CalTAD indices lower than 25 mm and another group higher than 25 mm to evaluate how the Palmer Parker score changed and no statistical differences were found between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Taking into consideration that good clinical results were obtained for TAD and CalTAD values superior to 25 mm, the prognostic value of 25 mm of TAD and CalTAD indices might not be appropriate to this new percutaneous plate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calcar referenced tip-apex distance (CalTAD); Cut-out; Extramedullary devices; Pertrocahanteric fracture; Tip-apex distance (TAD)

Year:  2016        PMID: 28360501      PMCID: PMC5359527          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2016.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  20 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive versus conventional dynamic hip screw for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in older patients.

Authors:  Zhiping Zhou; Xingxiang Zhang; Shoujin Tian; Yaogang Wu
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 1.390

2.  Projected incidence of proximal femoral fracture in England: a report from the NHS Hip Fracture Anaesthesia Network (HIPFAN).

Authors:  S M White; R Griffiths
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Measuring tip-apex distance using a picture archiving and communication system (PACS).

Authors:  Luke J Johnson; Marcus R Cope; Shahram Shahrokhi; Peter Tamblyn
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Reliability of predictors for screw cutout in intertrochanteric hip fractures.

Authors:  Kirstin De Bruijn; Dennis den Hartog; Wim Tuinebreijer; Gert Roukema
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture.

Authors:  M J Parker; C R Palmer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-09

6.  Predictive factors for cutting-out in femoral intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  Antonio Lobo-Escolar; Eduardo Joven; Daniel Iglesias; Antonio Herrera
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  How reliable and accurate is the AO/OTA comprehensive classification for adult long-bone fractures?

Authors:  Terje Meling; Knut Harboe; Cathrine H Enoksen; Morten Aarflot; Astvaldur J Arthursson; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.313

8.  Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee.

Authors:  J L Marsh; Theddy F Slongo; Julie Agel; J Scott Broderick; William Creevey; Thomas A DeCoster; Laura Prokuski; Michael S Sirkin; Bruce Ziran; Brad Henley; Laurent Audigé
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 9.  The percutaneous compression plate versus the dynamic hip screw for treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  J Ma; D Xing; X Ma; W Xu; J Wang; Y Chen; D Song
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 2.256

Review 10.  Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.

Authors:  Martyn J Parker; Helen Hg Handoll
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-09-08
View more
  1 in total

1.  New tip-apex distance and calcar-referenced tip-apex distance cut-offs may be the best predictors for cut-out risk after intramedullary fixation of proximal femur fractures.

Authors:  Gaetano Caruso; Nicola Corradi; Antonio Caldaria; Daniele Bottin; Dario Lo Re; Vincenzo Lorusso; Chiara Morotti; Giorgia Valpiani; Leo Massari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.