Literature DB >> 32055145

Failure of short versus long cephalomedullary nail after intertrochanteric fractures.

Pernille Engell Bovbjerg1,2, Morten Schultz Larsen3, Carsten Fladmose Madsen3, Jesper Schønnemann2.   

Abstract

The aim of study is to examine the frequency of reoperation and difference in failures for short cephalomedullary nail (SN) and long cephalomedullary nail (LN).We included patients with an intertrochanteric fracture treated with Gamma nail (Stryker®). All radiographs were reviewed, TAD and diastasis were measured, and type of failure registered.216 patients were included, 95 short nails and 121 long nails. We found 12 reoperations, 5 in the SN group and 7 in the LN group. Most common failure was cut out. Our study showed no difference in frequency of reoperations or type of failures.
© 2019 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cephalomedullary nail; Complication; Gamma nail; Hip fracture; Intertrochanteric fracture; Intramedullary nail

Year:  2019        PMID： 32055145      PMCID： PMC7005477          DOI： 10.1016/j.jor.2019.10.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN： 0972-978X


  18 in total

1.  Gamma nail in the treatment of closed trochanteric fractures. Results and indications of 121 cases.

Authors:  I Kempf; A Grosse; G Taglang; E Favreul
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.256

2.  Short versus long intramedullary nails for treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1 and A2).

Authors:  Christopher Boone; Kelly N Carlberg; Denise M Koueiter; Kevin C Baker; Jason Sadowski; Patrick J Wiater; Gregory P Nowinski; Kevin D Grant
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 3.  Epidemiology of hip fractures.

Authors:  P Kannus; J Parkkari; H Sievänen; A Heinonen; I Vuori; M Järvinen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Comparative study of the second and third generation of gamma nail for trochanteric fractures: review of 218 cases.

Authors:  Juan Mingo-Robinet; Miguel Torres-Torres; Carmen Martínez-Cervell; Juan Antonio Alonso Del Olmo; Jose A Rivas Laso; Hector Aguado-Hernández; Isidro Burón-Alvarez
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 5.  Long and short intramedullary nails for fixation of intertrochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1, A2 and A3): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Y Zhang; S Zhang; S Wang; H Zhang; W Zhang; P Liu; J Ma; N Pervaiz; J Wang
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.256

6.  Nail or plate fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: changing pattern of practice. A review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database.

Authors:  Jeffrey O Anglen; James N Weinstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Implant-related fractures of the femur following hip fracture surgery.

Authors:  C M Robinson; C I Adams; M Craig; W Doward; M C C Clarke; J Auld
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Short versus long cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in patients older than 65 years.

Authors:  Conor Kleweno; Jordan Morgan; James Redshaw; Mitchel Harris; Edward Rodriguez; David Zurakowski; Mark Vrahas; Paul Appleton
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 9.  Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture.

Authors:  Nicola Veronese; Stefania Maggi
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 10.  Tip to apex distance in femoral intertrochanteric fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jorge Rubio-Avila; Kim Madden; Nicole Simunovic; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 1.601
View more
  3 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes following long versus short cephalomedullary devices for fixation of extracapsular hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gabriel Kai Yang Tan; Christoph Sheng Chong; Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  New Prognostic Factors in Operated Extracapsular Hip Fractures: Infection and GammaTScore.

Authors:  Carlos Hernández-Pascual; José Ángel Santos-Sánchez; Jorge Hernández-Rodríguez; Carlos Fernando Silva-Viamonte; Carmen Pablos-Hernández; Manuel Villanueva-Martínez; José Antonio Mirón-Canelo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Biomechanical comparison of medial sustainable nail and proximal femoral nail antirotation in the treatment of an unstable intertrochanteric fracture.

Authors:  Shaobo Nie; Ming Li; Hui Ji; Zhirui Li; Wenwen Li; Hao Zhang; Zhang Licheng; Peifu Tang
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.410
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.