Literature DB >> 20824148

Docking Small Molecules to Predicted Off-Targets of the Cancer Drug Erlotinib Leads to Inhibitors of Lung Cancer Cell Proliferation with Suitable In vitro Pharmacokinetic Properties.

Liwei Li1, Jing Li, May Khanna, Inha Jo, Jason P Baird, Samy O Meroueh.   

Abstract

In an effort to develop a rational approach to identify anti-cancer agents with selective polypharmacology, we mine millions of docked protein-ligand complexes involving more than a thousand cancer targets from multiple signaling pathways to identify new structural templates for proven pharmacophores. Our method combines Support Vector Machine-based scoring to enrich the initial library of 1,592 molecules, with a fingerprint-based search for molecules that have the same binding profile as the EGFR kinase inhibitor erlotinib. Twelve new compounds were identified. In vitro activity assays revealed that three inhibited EGFR with IC(50) values ranging from 250 nM to 200 µM. Additional in vitro studies with hERG, CYP450, DNA and cell culture-based assays further compared their properties to erlotinib. One compound combined suitable pharmacokinetic properties while closely mimicking the binding profile of erlotinib. The compound also inhibited H1299 and H460 tumor cell proliferation. The other two compounds shared some of the binding profile of erlotinib, and one gave the most potent inhibition of tumor cell growth. Interestingly, among the compounds that had not shown inhibition of EGFR, four blocked H1299 and H460 proliferation, one potently with IC(50) values near 1 µM. This compound was from the menogaril family, which reached Phase II clinical trial for the treatment of lymphomas. This suggests that our computational approach comparing binding profile may have favored molecules with anti-cancer properties like erlotinib.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20824148      PMCID: PMC2931832          DOI: 10.1021/ml100031a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett        ISSN: 1948-5875            Impact factor:   4.345


  14 in total

Review 1.  Molecular and cellular mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmias.

Authors:  M T Keating; M C Sanguinetti
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Structure-activity relationships observed on screening a series of pyrazolopyrimidines against experimental neoplasms.

Authors:  H E SKIPPER; R K ROBINS; J R THOMSON; C C CHENG; R W BROCKMAN; F M SCHABEL
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1957-07       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Novel paradigms for drug discovery: computational multitarget screening.

Authors:  Ekachai Jenwitheesuk; Jeremy A Horst; Kasey L Rivas; Wesley C Van Voorhis; Ram Samudrala
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 14.819

4.  Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Frances A Shepherd; José Rodrigues Pereira; Tudor Ciuleanu; Eng Huat Tan; Vera Hirsh; Sumitra Thongprasert; Daniel Campos; Savitree Maoleekoonpiroj; Michael Smylie; Renato Martins; Maximiliano van Kooten; Mircea Dediu; Brian Findlay; Dongsheng Tu; Dianne Johnston; Andrea Bezjak; Gary Clark; Pedro Santabárbara; Lesley Seymour
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Cytotoxicity and antitumor activities of fungal bis(naphtho-gamma-pyrone) derivatives.

Authors:  K Koyama; K Ominato; S Natori; T Tashiro; T Tsuruo
Journal:  J Pharmacobiodyn       Date:  1988-09

6.  Pyrimidines. XXII. 2,4-Diamino-6-aryl-amino-5-pyrimidinecarboxaldehydes and related compounds.

Authors:  D E O'Brien; L T Weinstock; C C Cheng
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Targeting the human cancer pathway protein interaction network by structural genomics.

Authors:  Yuanpeng Janet Huang; Dehua Hang; Long Jason Lu; Liang Tong; Mark B Gerstein; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2008-05-18       Impact factor: 5.911

8.  Anticancer activities of orally administered menogaril against human stomach and breast cancers implanted in nude mice.

Authors:  M Inaba; S Sato; T Yamori; T Tashiro; Y Ohnishi; K Maruo; Y Ueyama; T Tsuruo
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.480

9.  A small-cell lung cancer genome with complex signatures of tobacco exposure.

Authors:  Erin D Pleasance; Philip J Stephens; Sarah O'Meara; David J McBride; Alison Meynert; David Jones; Meng-Lay Lin; David Beare; King Wai Lau; Chris Greenman; Ignacio Varela; Serena Nik-Zainal; Helen R Davies; Gonzalo R Ordoñez; Laura J Mudie; Calli Latimer; Sarah Edkins; Lucy Stebbings; Lina Chen; Mingming Jia; Catherine Leroy; John Marshall; Andrew Menzies; Adam Butler; Jon W Teague; Jonathon Mangion; Yongming A Sun; Stephen F McLaughlin; Heather E Peckham; Eric F Tsung; Gina L Costa; Clarence C Lee; John D Minna; Adi Gazdar; Ewan Birney; Michael D Rhodes; Kevin J McKernan; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal; Peter J Campbell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  BioDrugScreen: a computational drug design resource for ranking molecules docked to the human proteome.

Authors:  Liwei Li; Khuchtumur Bum-Erdene; Peter H Baenziger; Joshua J Rosen; Jamison R Hemmert; Joy A Nellis; Marlon E Pierce; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  9 in total

1.  Support vector regression scoring of receptor-ligand complexes for rank-ordering and virtual screening of chemical libraries.

Authors:  Liwei Li; Bo Wang; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Exploring a structural protein-drug interactome for new therapeutics in lung cancer.

Authors:  Xiaodong Peng; Fang Wang; Liwei Li; Khuchtumur Bum-Erdene; David Xu; Bo Wang; Anthony A Sinn; Karen E Pollok; George E Sandusky; Lang Li; John J Turchi; Shadia I Jalal; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2014-01-09

3.  Effect of Binding Pose and Modeled Structures on SVMGen and GlideScore Enrichment of Chemical Libraries.

Authors:  David Xu; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Virtual screening targeting the urokinase receptor, biochemical and cell-based studies, synthesis, pharmacokinetic characterization, and effect on breast tumor metastasis.

Authors:  Fang Wang; Jing Li; Anthony L Sinn; W Eric Knabe; May Khanna; Inha Jo; Jayne M Silver; Kyungsoo Oh; Liwei Li; George E Sandusky; George W Sledge; Harikrishna Nakshatri; David R Jones; Karen E Pollok; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Structure-Based Target-Specific Screening Leads to Small-Molecule CaMKII Inhibitors.

Authors:  David Xu; Liwei Li; Donghui Zhou; Degang Liu; Andy Hudmon; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  Target-specific support vector machine scoring in structure-based virtual screening: computational validation, in vitro testing in kinases, and effects on lung cancer cell proliferation.

Authors:  Liwei Li; May Khanna; Inha Jo; Fang Wang; Nicole M Ashpole; Andy Hudmon; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Molecular recognition in a diverse set of protein-ligand interactions studied with molecular dynamics simulations and end-point free energy calculations.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Liwei Li; Thomas D Hurley; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Does a more precise chemical description of protein-ligand complexes lead to more accurate prediction of binding affinity?

Authors:  Pedro J Ballester; Adrian Schreyer; Tom L Blundell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Historeceptomic Fingerprints for Drug-Like Compounds.

Authors:  Evgeny Shmelkov; Arsen Grigoryan; James Swetnam; Junyang Xin; Doreen Tivon; Sergey V Shmelkov; Timothy Cardozo
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 4.566

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.