Literature DB >> 21728360

Support vector regression scoring of receptor-ligand complexes for rank-ordering and virtual screening of chemical libraries.

Liwei Li1, Bo Wang, Samy O Meroueh.   

Abstract

The community structure-activity resource (CSAR) data sets are used to develop and test a support vector machine-based scoring function in regression mode (SVR). Two scoring functions (SVR-KB and SVR-EP) are derived with the objective of reproducing the trend of the experimental binding affinities provided within the two CSAR data sets. The features used to train SVR-KB are knowledge-based pairwise potentials, while SVR-EP is based on physicochemical properties. SVR-KB and SVR-EP were compared to seven other widely used scoring functions, including Glide, X-score, GoldScore, ChemScore, Vina, Dock, and PMF. Results showed that SVR-KB trained with features obtained from three-dimensional complexes of the PDBbind data set outperformed all other scoring functions, including best performing X-score, by nearly 0.1 using three correlation coefficients, namely Pearson, Spearman, and Kendall. It was interesting that higher performance in rank ordering did not translate into greater enrichment in virtual screening assessed using the 40 targets of the Directory of Useful Decoys (DUD). To remedy this situation, a variant of SVR-KB (SVR-KBD) was developed by following a target-specific tailoring strategy that we had previously employed to derive SVM-SP. SVR-KBD showed a much higher enrichment, outperforming all other scoring functions tested, and was comparable in performance to our previously derived scoring function SVM-SP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21728360      PMCID: PMC3209528          DOI: 10.1021/ci200078f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  28 in total

1.  Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Luhua Lai; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  The PDBbind database: collection of binding affinities for protein-ligand complexes with known three-dimensional structures.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Xueliang Fang; Yipin Lu; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening.

Authors:  Thomas A Halgren; Robert B Murphy; Richard A Friesner; Hege S Beard; Leah L Frye; W Thomas Pollard; Jay L Banks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 4.  Virtual screening of chemical libraries.

Authors:  Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Virtual screening workflow development guided by the "receiver operating characteristic" curve approach. Application to high-throughput docking on metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 4.

Authors:  Nicolas Triballeau; Francine Acher; Isabelle Brabet; Jean-Philippe Pin; Hugues-Olivier Bertrand
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  A computational investigation of allostery in the catabolite activator protein.

Authors:  Liwei Li; Vladimir N Uversky; A Keith Dunker; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes.

Authors:  M D Eldridge; C W Murray; T R Auton; G V Paolini; R P Mee
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  A genetic algorithm for flexible molecular overlay and pharmacophore elucidation.

Authors:  G Jones; P Willett; R C Glen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Target-specific support vector machine scoring in structure-based virtual screening: computational validation, in vitro testing in kinases, and effects on lung cancer cell proliferation.

Authors:  Liwei Li; May Khanna; Inha Jo; Fang Wang; Nicole M Ashpole; Andy Hudmon; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Binding affinity prediction with property-encoded shape distribution signatures.

Authors:  Sourav Das; Michael P Krein; Curt M Breneman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.956

View more
  29 in total

1.  Quantum probability ranking principle for ligand-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Mohammed Mumtaz Al-Dabbagh; Naomie Salim; Mubarak Himmat; Ali Ahmed; Faisal Saeed
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Docking pose selection by interaction pattern graph similarity: application to the D3R grand challenge 2015.

Authors:  Inna Slynko; Franck Da Silva; Guillaume Bret; Didier Rognan
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Improving scoring-docking-screening powers of protein-ligand scoring functions using random forest.

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 4.  Applications of Support Vector Machine (SVM) Learning in Cancer Genomics.

Authors:  Shujun Huang; Nianguang Cai; Pedro Penzuti Pacheco; Shavira Narrandes; Yang Wang; Wayne Xu
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.069

5.  Effect of Binding Pose and Modeled Structures on SVMGen and GlideScore Enrichment of Chemical Libraries.

Authors:  David Xu; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Structure-Based Target-Specific Screening Leads to Small-Molecule CaMKII Inhibitors.

Authors:  David Xu; Liwei Li; Donghui Zhou; Degang Liu; Andy Hudmon; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  Phenotypic Screening of Chemical Libraries Enriched by Molecular Docking to Multiple Targets Selected from Glioblastoma Genomic Data.

Authors:  David Xu; Donghui Zhou; Khuchtumur Bum-Erdene; Barbara J Bailey; Kamakshi Sishtla; Sheng Liu; Jun Wan; Uma K Aryal; Jonathan A Lee; Clark D Wells; Melissa L Fishel; Timothy W Corson; Karen E Pollok; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.100

8.  Molecular recognition in a diverse set of protein-ligand interactions studied with molecular dynamics simulations and end-point free energy calculations.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Liwei Li; Thomas D Hurley; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Machine learning on ligand-residue interaction profiles to significantly improve binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Beihong Ji; Xibing He; Jingchen Zhai; Yuzhao Zhang; Viet Hoang Man; Junmei Wang
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 11.622

10.  GNINA 1.0: molecular docking with deep learning.

Authors:  Andrew T McNutt; Paul Francoeur; Rishal Aggarwal; Tomohide Masuda; Rocco Meli; Matthew Ragoza; Jocelyn Sunseri; David Ryan Koes
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.514

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.