Literature DB >> 24032517

Molecular recognition in a diverse set of protein-ligand interactions studied with molecular dynamics simulations and end-point free energy calculations.

Bo Wang1, Liwei Li, Thomas D Hurley, Samy O Meroueh.   

Abstract

End-point free energy calculations using MM-GBSA and MM-PBSA provide a detailed understanding of molecular recognition in protein-ligand interactions. The binding free energy can be used to rank-order protein-ligand structures in virtual screening for compound or target identification. Here, we carry out free energy calculations for a diverse set of 11 proteins bound to 14 small molecules using extensive explicit-solvent MD simulations. The structure of these complexes was previously solved by crystallography and their binding studied with isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) data enabling direct comparison to the MM-GBSA and MM-PBSA calculations. Four MM-GBSA and three MM-PBSA calculations reproduced the ITC free energy within 1 kcal·mol(-1) highlighting the challenges in reproducing the absolute free energy from end-point free energy calculations. MM-GBSA exhibited better rank-ordering with a Spearman ρ of 0.68 compared to 0.40 for MM-PBSA with dielectric constant (ε = 1). An increase in ε resulted in significantly better rank-ordering for MM-PBSA (ρ = 0.91 for ε = 10), but larger ε significantly reduced the contributions of electrostatics, suggesting that the improvement is due to the nonpolar and entropy components, rather than a better representation of the electrostatics. The SVRKB scoring function applied to MD snapshots resulted in excellent rank-ordering (ρ = 0.81). Calculations of the configurational entropy using normal-mode analysis led to free energies that correlated significantly better to the ITC free energy than the MD-based quasi-harmonic approach, but the computed entropies showed no correlation with the ITC entropy. When the adaptation energy is taken into consideration by running separate simulations for complex, apo, and ligand (MM-PBSAADAPT), there is less agreement with the ITC data for the individual free energies, but remarkably good rank-ordering is observed (ρ = 0.89). Interestingly, filtering MD snapshots by prescoring protein-ligand complexes with a machine learning-based approach (SVMSP) resulted in a significant improvement in the MM-PBSA results (ε = 1) from ρ = 0.40 to ρ = 0.81. Finally, the nonpolar components of MM-GBSA and MM-PBSA, but not the electrostatic components, showed strong correlation to the ITC free energy; the computed entropies did not correlate with the ITC entropy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24032517      PMCID: PMC4058328          DOI: 10.1021/ci400312v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  31 in total

1.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 2.  Force fields for protein simulations.

Authors:  Jay W Ponder; David A Case
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  2003

3.  Accelerated Poisson-Boltzmann calculations for static and dynamic systems.

Authors:  Ray Luo; Laurent David; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Yong Duan; Chun Wu; Shibasish Chowdhury; Mathew C Lee; Guoming Xiong; Wei Zhang; Rong Yang; Piotr Cieplak; Ray Luo; Taisung Lee; James Caldwell; Junmei Wang; Peter Kollman
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Flexibility and conformational entropy in protein-protein binding.

Authors:  Raik Grünberg; Michael Nilges; Johan Leckner
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  Thermodynamic basis for promiscuity and selectivity in protein-protein interactions: PDZ domains, a case study.

Authors:  Nathalie Basdevant; Harel Weinstein; Marco Ceruso
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Estimation of changes in side chain configurational entropy in binding and folding: general methods and application to helix formation.

Authors:  K H Lee; D Xie; E Freire; L M Amzel
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1994-09

8.  Use of MM-PBSA in reproducing the binding free energies to HIV-1 RT of TIBO derivatives and predicting the binding mode to HIV-1 RT of efavirenz by docking and MM-PBSA.

Authors:  J Wang; P Morin; W Wang; P A Kollman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Target-specific support vector machine scoring in structure-based virtual screening: computational validation, in vitro testing in kinases, and effects on lung cancer cell proliferation.

Authors:  Liwei Li; May Khanna; Inha Jo; Fang Wang; Nicole M Ashpole; Andy Hudmon; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Thermodynamic integration to predict host-guest binding affinities.

Authors:  Morgan Lawrenz; Jeff Wereszczynski; Juan Manuel Ortiz-Sánchez; Sara E Nichols; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.686

View more
  15 in total

1.  Effect of Binding Pose and Modeled Structures on SVMGen and GlideScore Enrichment of Chemical Libraries.

Authors:  David Xu; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Structure-Based Target-Specific Screening Leads to Small-Molecule CaMKII Inhibitors.

Authors:  David Xu; Liwei Li; Donghui Zhou; Degang Liu; Andy Hudmon; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.466

3.  A new class of orthosteric uPAR·uPA small-molecule antagonists are allosteric inhibitors of the uPAR·vitronectin interaction.

Authors:  Degang Liu; Donghui Zhou; Bo Wang; William Eric Knabe; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 5.100

4.  Alchemical Free Energy Estimators and Molecular Dynamics Engines: Accuracy, Precision, and Reproducibility.

Authors:  Alexander D Wade; Agastya P Bhati; Shunzhou Wan; Peter V Coveney
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 6.578

Review 5.  Pharmacophore-based models for therapeutic drugs against phosphorylated tau in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jangampalli Adi Pradeepkiran; Arubala P Reddy; P Hemachandra Reddy
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 7.851

6.  Effects of HCM cTnI mutation R145G on troponin structure and modulation by PKA phosphorylation elucidated by molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Steffen Lindert; Yuanhua Cheng; Peter Kekenes-Huskey; Michael Regnier; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Enrichment of chemical libraries docked to protein conformational ensembles and application to aldehyde dehydrogenase 2.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Cameron D Buchman; Liwei Li; Thomas D Hurley; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  The effect of protein mutations on drug binding suggests ensuing personalised drug selection.

Authors:  Shunzhou Wan; Deepak Kumar; Valentin Ilyin; Ussama Al Homsi; Gulab Sher; Alexander Knuth; Peter V Coveney
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Molecular Dynamics Assisted Mechanistic Study of Isoniazid-Resistance against Mycobacterium tuberculosis InhA.

Authors:  Vivek Kumar; M Elizabeth Sobhia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Dynamics of the Human Leukocyte Antigen Head Domain Modulates Its Recognition by the T-Cell Receptor.

Authors:  Estefanía García-Guerrero; José Antonio Pérez-Simón; Luis Ignacio Sánchez-Abarca; Irene Díaz-Moreno; Miguel A De la Rosa; Antonio Díaz-Quintana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.