Literature DB >> 24402119

Exploring a structural protein-drug interactome for new therapeutics in lung cancer.

Xiaodong Peng1, Fang Wang, Liwei Li, Khuchtumur Bum-Erdene, David Xu, Bo Wang, Anthony A Sinn, Karen E Pollok, George E Sandusky, Lang Li, John J Turchi, Shadia I Jalal, Samy O Meroueh.   

Abstract

The pharmacology of drugs is often defined by more than one protein target. This property can be exploited to use approved drugs to uncover new targets and signaling pathways in cancer. Towards enabling a rational approach to uncover new targets, we expand a structural protein-ligand interactome () by scoring the interaction among 1000 FDA-approved drugs docked to 2500 pockets on protein structures of the human genome. This afforded a drug-target network whose properties compared favorably with previous networks constructed using experimental data. Among drugs with the highest degree and betweenness two are cancer drugs and one is currently used for treatment of lung cancer. Comparison of predicted cancer and non-cancer targets reveals that the most cancer-specific compounds were also the most selective compounds. Analysis of compound flexibility, hydrophobicity, and size showed that the most selective compounds were low molecular weight fragment-like heterocycles. We use a previously-developed screening approach using the cancer drug erlotinib as a template to screen other approved drugs that mimic its properties. Among the top 12 ranking candidates, four are cancer drugs, two of them kinase inhibitors (like erlotinib). Cellular studies using non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells revealed that several drugs inhibited lung cancer cell proliferation. We mined patient records at the Regenstrief Medical Record System to explore the possible association of exposure to three of these drugs with occurrence of lung cancer. Preliminary in vivo studies using the non-small cell lung cancer (NCLSC) xenograft model showed that losartan- and astemizole-treated mice had tumors that weighed 50 (p < 0.01) and 15 (p < 0.01) percent less than the treated controls. These results set the stage for further exploration of these drugs and to uncover new drugs for lung cancer therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24402119      PMCID: PMC4016822          DOI: 10.1039/c3mb70503j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biosyst        ISSN: 1742-2051


  39 in total

1.  Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Philippe Ferrara; Holger Gohlke; Daniel J Price; Gerhard Klebe; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  ZINC--a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening.

Authors:  John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Global mapping of pharmacological space.

Authors:  Gaia V Paolini; Richard H B Shapland; Willem P van Hoorn; Jonathan S Mason; Andrew L Hopkins
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  Can we rationally design promiscuous drugs?

Authors:  Andrew L Hopkins; Jonathan S Mason; John P Overington
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 6.809

5.  Drug-target network.

Authors:  Muhammed A Yildirim; Kwang-Il Goh; Michael E Cusick; Albert-László Barabási; Marc Vidal
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes.

Authors:  M D Eldridge; C W Murray; T R Auton; G V Paolini; R P Mee
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Effects of adrenaline in human colon adenocarcinoma HT-29 cells.

Authors:  Helen P S Wong; Judy W C Ho; Marcel W L Koo; Le Yu; William K K Wu; Emily K Y Lam; Emily K K Tai; Joshua K S Ko; Vivian Y Shin; Kent Man Chu; Chi Hin Cho
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 5.037

8.  The activity of 10-, 14-, and 21-day schedules of single-agent etoposide in previously untreated patients with extensive small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  P I Clark; B Cottier
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.929

9.  Targeting the human cancer pathway protein interaction network by structural genomics.

Authors:  Yuanpeng Janet Huang; Dehua Hang; Long Jason Lu; Liang Tong; Mark B Gerstein; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2008-05-18       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration.

Authors:  David S Wishart; Craig Knox; An Chi Guo; Savita Shrivastava; Murtaza Hassanali; Paul Stothard; Zhan Chang; Jennifer Woolsey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  4 in total

1.  The potential of translational bioinformatics approaches for pharmacology research.

Authors:  Lang Li
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Binding site matching in rational drug design: algorithms and applications.

Authors:  Misagh Naderi; Jeffrey Mitchell Lemoine; Rajiv Gandhi Govindaraj; Omar Zade Kana; Wei Pan Feinstein; Michal Brylinski
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  Effect of Binding Pose and Modeled Structures on SVMGen and GlideScore Enrichment of Chemical Libraries.

Authors:  David Xu; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Pathologically decreased expression of miR-193a contributes to metastasis by targeting WT1-E-cadherin axis in non-small cell lung cancers.

Authors:  Junjie Chen; Shenmeng Gao; Chunjing Wang; Zhonggai Wang; Huxiang Zhang; Kate Huang; Bin Zhou; Haiying Li; Zhijie Yu; Jianbo Wu; Chengshui Chen
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-11-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.