Literature DB >> 27154487

Effect of Binding Pose and Modeled Structures on SVMGen and GlideScore Enrichment of Chemical Libraries.

David Xu1, Samy O Meroueh.   

Abstract

Virtual screening consists of docking libraries of small molecules to a target protein followed by rank-ordering of the resulting structures using scoring functions. The ability of scoring methods to distinguish between actives and inactives depends on several factors that include the accuracy of the binding pose during the docking step and the quality of the three-dimensional structure of the target. Here, we build on our previous work to introduce a new scoring approach (SVMGen) that uses machine learning trained with features from statistical pair potentials obtained from three-dimensional crystal structures. We use SVMGen and GlideScore to explore how enrichment or rank-ordering is affected by binding pose accuracy. To that end, we create a validation set that consists strictly of proteins whose crystal structure was solved in complex with their inhibitors. For the rank-ordering studies, we use crystal structures from PDBbind along with corresponding binding affinity data provided in the database. In addition to binding pose, we investigate the effect of using modeled structures for the target on the enrichment performance of SVMGen and GlideScore. To accomplish this, we generated homology models for protein kinases in DUD-E for which crystal structures are available to enable comparison of enrichment between modeled and crystal structure. We also generate homology models for kinases in SARfari for which there are many known small-molecule inhibitors but no known crystal structure. These models are used to assess the ability of SVMGen and GlideScore to distinguish between actives and decoys. We focus our work on protein kinases considering the wealth of structural and binding affinity data that exists for this family of proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27154487      PMCID: PMC5483183          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  45 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction.

Authors:  Matthew P Jacobson; David L Pincus; Chaya S Rapp; Tyler J F Day; Barry Honig; David E Shaw; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-05-01

3.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Comprehensive analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity.

Authors:  Mindy I Davis; Jeremy P Hunt; Sanna Herrgard; Pietro Ciceri; Lisa M Wodicka; Gabriel Pallares; Michael Hocker; Daniel K Treiber; Patrick P Zarrinkar
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Identifying and characterizing binding sites and assessing druggability.

Authors:  Thomas A Halgren
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Xun Li; Yan Li; Zhihai Liu; Renxiao Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Exploring a structural protein-drug interactome for new therapeutics in lung cancer.

Authors:  Xiaodong Peng; Fang Wang; Liwei Li; Khuchtumur Bum-Erdene; David Xu; Bo Wang; Anthony A Sinn; Karen E Pollok; George E Sandusky; Lang Li; John J Turchi; Shadia I Jalal; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2014-01-09

8.  Novel inhibitor discovery through virtual screening against multiple protein conformations generated via ligand-directed modeling: a maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase example.

Authors:  Kiran V Mahasenan; Chenglong Li
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Target-specific support vector machine scoring in structure-based virtual screening: computational validation, in vitro testing in kinases, and effects on lung cancer cell proliferation.

Authors:  Liwei Li; May Khanna; Inha Jo; Fang Wang; Nicole M Ashpole; Andy Hudmon; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Incorporation of protein flexibility and conformational energy penalties in docking screens to improve ligand discovery.

Authors:  Marcus Fischer; Ryan G Coleman; James S Fraser; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 24.427

View more
  1 in total

1.  Structure-Based Target-Specific Screening Leads to Small-Molecule CaMKII Inhibitors.

Authors:  David Xu; Liwei Li; Donghui Zhou; Degang Liu; Andy Hudmon; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.466

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.