Literature DB >> 9110028

Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method for statistical analysis of multireader, multimodality receiver operating characteristic data: validation with computer simulation.

C A Roe1, C E Metz.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: The authors examined the relationship between the critical P value (alpha) and the empirical type I error rate when using the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz (DMB) method for analysis of variance in multireader, multimodality receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.
METHODS: The authors developed a linear mixed-effect model to generate continuous, normally distributed random decision variables containing multiple sources (components) of variation. A range of magnitudes for these variance components was used to stimulate experiments in which multiple readers (three or five) read imaged obtained with two modalities from the same set of cases with no re-reading. Three binormal population ROC curves, with areas of 0.962, 0.855, and 0.702, were included. Case-sample sizes ranged from 50 to 400, and either 50% or 10% of cases were actually positive. For each experiment, 2,000 data sets were analyzed by the computer program, and the proportion of 2,000 modality differences that was found to be statistically significant at an alpha level of .05 was tubulated.
RESULTS: The test for modality difference performed well for the low and intermediate ROC curves, even with small case samples. For the high ROC curve, the small-sample results were conservative. No relationship between observed type I error rate and the magnitude of data correlation was evident.
CONCLUSION: For typical ROC curves, the DBM method is robust in testing for modality effects in the null case, given a sufficient sample size. Instructions for obtaining a free copy of the software are given.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9110028     DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(97)80032-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  36 in total

Review 1.  ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature.

Authors:  Charles E Metz
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2007-10-27

2.  Investigation of optimal viewing size for detecting nodular ground-glass opacity on high-resolution computed tomography with cine-mode display.

Authors:  Michihiro Yamaguchi; Yuichi Bessho; Tatsuro Inoue; Yoshiyuki Asai; Tomoshige Matsumoto; Kenya Murase
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2010-08-19

3.  Assessing operating characteristics of CAD algorithms in the absence of a gold standard.

Authors:  Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; David S Paik; Chin A Yi; Sandy Napel; Justus Roos; Geoffrey D Rubin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Evaluating imaging and computer-aided detection and diagnosis devices at the FDA.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas; Heang-Ping Chan; Carl J D'Orsi; Lori E Dodd; Maryellen L Giger; David Gur; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Charles E Metz; Kyle J Myers; Nancy A Obuchowski; Berkman Sahiner; Alicia Y Toledano; Margarita L Zuley
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Teaching search patterns to medical trainees in an educational laboratory to improve perception of pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  William F Auffermann; Brent P Little; Srini Tridandapani
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-11-06

6.  Multireader multicase reader studies with binary agreement data: simulation, analysis, validation, and sizing.

Authors:  Weijie Chen; Adam Wunderlich; Nicholas Petrick; Brandon D Gallas
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-12-04

7.  The influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on observer performance for the detection of nodular lesions on chest radiographs.

Authors:  H Usami; M Ikeda; T Ishigaki; H Fukushima; K Shimamoto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Monte Carlo validation of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method using normalized pseudovalues and less data-based model simplification.

Authors:  Stephen L Hillis; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  A comparison of denominator degrees of freedom methods for multiple observer ROC analysis.

Authors:  Stephen L Hillis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  A status report on free-response analysis.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 0.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.