Literature DB >> 20813952

The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment.

Damon Centola1.   

Abstract

How do social networks affect the spread of behavior? A popular hypothesis states that networks with many clustered ties and a high degree of separation will be less effective for behavioral diffusion than networks in which locally redundant ties are rewired to provide shortcuts across the social space. A competing hypothesis argues that when behaviors require social reinforcement, a network with more clustering may be more advantageous, even if the network as a whole has a larger diameter. I investigated the effects of network structure on diffusion by studying the spread of health behavior through artificially structured online communities. Individual adoption was much more likely when participants received social reinforcement from multiple neighbors in the social network. The behavior spread farther and faster across clustered-lattice networks than across corresponding random networks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20813952     DOI: 10.1126/science.1185231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  335 in total

1.  Adoption of a High-Impact Innovation in a Homogeneous Population.

Authors:  Curtis H Weiss; Julia Poncela-Casasnovas; Joshua I Glaser; Adam R Pah; Stephen D Persell; David W Baker; Richard G Wunderink; Luís A Nunes Amaral
Journal:  Phys Rev X       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 15.762

2.  The dynamics of social innovation.

Authors:  H Peyton Young
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Social selection and peer influence in an online social network.

Authors:  Kevin Lewis; Marco Gonzalez; Jason Kaufman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Kantian fractionalization predicts the conflict propensity of the international system.

Authors:  Skyler J Cranmer; Elizabeth J Menninga; Peter J Mucha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A cross-hazard analysis of terse message retransmission on Twitter.

Authors:  Jeannette Sutton; C Ben Gibson; Nolan Edward Phillips; Emma S Spiro; Cedar League; Britta Johnson; Sean M Fitzhugh; Carter T Butts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The spontaneous emergence of conventions: an experimental study of cultural evolution.

Authors:  Damon Centola; Andrea Baronchelli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  E-mail to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Within Social Networks: Acceptability and Content.

Authors:  Sarah L Cutrona; Joann Wagner; Douglas W Roblin; Bridget Gaglio; Andrew Williams; Rosalie Torres-Stone; Kathleen M Mazor
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2015-04-03

8.  Anyone Can Become a Troll: Causes of Trolling Behavior in Online Discussions.

Authors:  Justin Cheng; Michael Bernstein; Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil; Jure Leskovec
Journal:  CSCW Conf Comput Support Coop Work       Date:  2017 Feb-Mar

9.  A model of social influence on body mass index.

Authors:  Ross A Hammond; Joseph T Ornstein
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Offspring social network structure predicts fitness in families.

Authors:  Nick J Royle; Thomas W Pike; Philipp Heeb; Heinz Richner; Mathias Kölliker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.