Literature DB >> 23097505

Offspring social network structure predicts fitness in families.

Nick J Royle1, Thomas W Pike, Philipp Heeb, Heinz Richner, Mathias Kölliker.   

Abstract

Social structures such as families emerge as outcomes of behavioural interactions among individuals, and can evolve over time if families with particular types of social structures tend to leave more individuals in subsequent generations. The social behaviour of interacting individuals is typically analysed as a series of multiple dyadic (pair-wise) interactions, rather than a network of interactions among multiple individuals. However, in species where parents feed dependant young, interactions within families nearly always involve more than two individuals simultaneously. Such social networks of interactions at least partly reflect conflicts of interest over the provision of costly parental investment. Consequently, variation in family network structure reflects variation in how conflicts of interest are resolved among family members. Despite its importance in understanding the evolution of emergent properties of social organization such as family life and cooperation, nothing is currently known about how selection acts on the structure of social networks. Here, we show that the social network structure of broods of begging nestling great tits Parus major predicts fitness in families. Although selection at the level of the individual favours large nestlings, selection at the level of the kin-group primarily favours families that resolve conflicts most effectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23097505      PMCID: PMC3497231          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  24 in total

1.  Clutch size evolution under sexual conflict enhances the stability of mating systems.

Authors:  H G Smith; R Härdling
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Social insect networks.

Authors:  Jennifer H Fewell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment.

Authors:  Damon Centola
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks.

Authors:  Hisashi Ohtsuki; Christoph Hauert; Erez Lieberman; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans.

Authors:  David G Rand; Samuel Arbesman; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Ectoparasite infestation and sex-biased local recruitment of hosts.

Authors:  P Heeb; I Werner; A C Mateman; M Kölliker; M W Brinkhof; C M Lessells; H Richner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Co-evolution of behaviour and social network structure promotes human cooperation.

Authors:  Katrin Fehl; Daniel J van der Post; Dirk Semmann
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Model of genetic variation in human social networks.

Authors:  James H Fowler; Christopher T Dawes; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Heritability of nestling begging intensity in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus).

Authors:  Roi Dor; Arnon Lotem
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-01-02       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Parental effort and response to nestling begging in the house sparrow: repeatability, heritability and parent-offspring co-evolution.

Authors:  R Dor; A Lotem
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.411

View more
  12 in total

1.  Agonistic reciprocity is associated with reduced male reproductive success within haremic social networks.

Authors:  Tessa K Solomon-Lane; Devaleena S Pradhan; Madelyne C Willis; Matthew S Grober
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Social interactions shape individual and collective personality in social spiders.

Authors:  Edmund R Hunt; Brian Mi; Camila Fernandez; Brandyn M Wong; Jonathan N Pruitt; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Offspring dynamics affect food provisioning, growth and mortality in a brood-caring spider.

Authors:  Jasmin Ruch; Marie E Herberstein; Jutta M Schneider
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Resting networks and personality predict attack speed in social spiders.

Authors:  Edmund R Hunt; Brian Mi; Rediet Geremew; Camila Fernandez; Brandyn M Wong; Jonathan N Pruitt; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Network integration and limits to social inheritance in vervet monkeys.

Authors:  Jonathan D Jarrett; Tyler R Bonnell; Christopher Young; Louise Barrett; S Peter Henzi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Group composition of individual personalities alters social network structure in experimental populations of forked fungus beetles.

Authors:  Phoebe A Cook; Olivia M Baker; Robin A Costello; Vincent A Formica; Edmund D Brodie
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Reproductive correlates of social network variation in plurally breeding degus (Octodon degus).

Authors:  Tina W Wey; Joseph R Burger; Luis A Ebensperger; Loren D Hayes
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 8.  Developmental stress and social phenotypes: integrating neuroendocrine, behavioural and evolutionary perspectives.

Authors:  Karen A Spencer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  How Do Growth and Sibling Competition Affect Telomere Dynamics in the First Month of Life of Long-Lived Seabird?

Authors:  Yuichi Mizutani; Yasuaki Niizuma; Ken Yoda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cooperative investment in public goods is kin directed in communal nests of social birds.

Authors:  René E van Dijk; Jennifer C Kaden; Araceli Argüelles-Ticó; Deborah A Dawson; Terry Burke; Ben J Hatchwell
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 9.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.