Literature DB >> 26627233

A cross-hazard analysis of terse message retransmission on Twitter.

Jeannette Sutton1, C Ben Gibson2, Nolan Edward Phillips2, Emma S Spiro3, Cedar League4, Britta Johnson4, Sean M Fitzhugh2, Carter T Butts5.   

Abstract

For decades, public warning messages have been relayed via broadcast information channels, including radio and television; more recently, risk communication channels have expanded to include social media sites, where messages can be easily amplified by user retransmission. This research examines the factors that predict the extent of retransmission for official hazard communications disseminated via Twitter. Using data from events involving five different hazards, we identity three types of attributes--local network properties, message content, and message style--that jointly amplify and/or attenuate the retransmission of official communications under imminent threat. We find that the use of an agreed-upon hashtag and the number of users following an official account positively influence message retransmission, as does message content describing hazard impacts or emphasizing cohesion among users. By contrast, messages directed at individuals, expressing gratitude, or including a URL were less widely disseminated than similar messages without these features. Our findings suggest that some measures commonly taken to convey additional information to the public (e.g., URL inclusion) may come at a cost in terms of message amplification; on the other hand, some types of content not traditionally emphasized in guidance on hazard communication may enhance retransmission rates.

Keywords:  communication; disaster; retransmission; social media; warning

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26627233      PMCID: PMC4672824          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1508916112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  8 in total

1.  Evolving informational credentials: the (mis)attribution of believable facts to credible sources.

Authors:  Alison R Fragale; Chip Heath
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-02

2.  The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment.

Authors:  Damon Centola
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Sampling an unknown universe: problems of researching mass casualty incidents (a history of ECRU's field research).

Authors:  Joseph Scanlon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Social amplification of risk in the Internet environment.

Authors:  Ik Jae Chung
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  The value of instructional communication in crisis situations: restoring order to chaos.

Authors:  Timothy L Sellnow; Deanna D Sellnow; Derek R Lane; Robert S Littlefield
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: an empirical study.

Authors:  R G Peters; V T Covello; D B McCallum
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Terse messaging and public health in the midst of natural disasters: the case of the Boulder floods.

Authors:  Jeannette Sutton; Cedar League; Timothy L Sellnow; Deanna D Sellnow
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2015

8.  Designing risk communications: completing and correcting mental models of hazardous processes, Part I.

Authors:  C J Atman; A Bostrom; B Fischhoff; M G Morgan
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.000

  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  Health Communication Trolls and Bots Versus Public Health Agencies' Trusted Voices.

Authors:  Jeannette Sutton
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Emergent social cohesion for coping with community disruptions in disasters.

Authors:  Chao Fan; Yucheng Jiang; Ali Mostafavi
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Urban mobility and neighborhood isolation in America's 50 largest cities.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Nolan Edward Phillips; Mario L Small; Robert J Sampson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The effect of spokesperson attribution on public health message sharing during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Ahmad Abu-Akel; Andreas Spitz; Robert West
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Modeling the popularity of twitter hashtags with master equations.

Authors:  Oscar Fontanelli; Demian Hernández; Ricardo Mansilla
Journal:  Soc Netw Anal Min       Date:  2022-02-02

6.  Understanding the effects of message cues on COVID-19 information sharing on Twitter.

Authors:  Han Zheng; Dion Hoe-Lian Goh; Edmund Wei Jian Lee; Chei Sian Lee; Yin-Leng Theng
Journal:  J Assoc Inf Sci Technol       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Cutting Through the Noise: Predictors of Successful Online Message Retransmission in the First 8 Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Scott Leo Renshaw; Sabrina Mai; Elisabeth Dubois; Jeannette Sutton; Carter T Butts
Journal:  Health Secur       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb

8.  A novel surveillance approach for disaster mental health.

Authors:  Oliver Gruebner; Sarah R Lowe; Martin Sykora; Ketan Shankardass; S V Subramanian; Sandro Galea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  COVID-19: Retransmission of official communications in an emerging pandemic.

Authors:  Jeannette Sutton; Scott L Renshaw; Carter T Butts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Negative Emotions in New York City After a Natural Disaster as Seen in Social Media.

Authors:  Oliver Gruebner; Sarah R Lowe; Martin Sykora; Ketan Shankardass; S V Subramanian; Sandro Galea
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.