Literature DB >> 29399664

Anyone Can Become a Troll: Causes of Trolling Behavior in Online Discussions.

Justin Cheng1, Michael Bernstein1, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil2, Jure Leskovec1.   

Abstract

In online communities, antisocial behavior such as trolling disrupts constructive discussion. While prior work suggests that trolling behavior is confined to a vocal and antisocial minority, we demonstrate that ordinary people can engage in such behavior as well. We propose two primary trigger mechanisms: the individual's mood, and the surrounding context of a discussion (e.g., exposure to prior trolling behavior). Through an experiment simulating an online discussion, we find that both negative mood and seeing troll posts by others significantly increases the probability of a user trolling, and together double this probability. To support and extend these results, we study how these same mechanisms play out in the wild via a data-driven, longitudinal analysis of a large online news discussion community. This analysis reveals temporal mood effects, and explores long range patterns of repeated exposure to trolling. A predictive model of trolling behavior shows that mood and discussion context together can explain trolling behavior better than an individual's history of trolling. These results combine to suggest that ordinary people can, under the right circumstances, behave like trolls.

Entities:  

Keywords:  H.2.8 Database Management: Database Applications–Data Mining; J.4 Computer Applications: Social and Behavioral Sciences; Trolling; antisocial behavior; online communities

Year:  2017        PMID: 29399664      PMCID: PMC5791909          DOI: 10.1145/2998181.2998213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CSCW Conf Comput Support Coop Work


  19 in total

Review 1.  Social influence: compliance and conformity.

Authors:  Robert B Cialdini; Noah J Goldstein
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment.

Authors:  Damon Centola
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents.

Authors:  Juliana Raskauskas; Ann D Stoltz
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2007-05

4.  Social influence bias: a randomized experiment.

Authors:  Lev Muchnik; Sinan Aral; Sean J Taylor
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Air pollution, weather, and violent crimes: concomitant time-series analysis of archival data.

Authors:  J Rotton; J Frey
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1985-11

6.  Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep, and daylength across diverse cultures.

Authors:  Scott A Golder; Michael W Macy
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The online disinhibition effect.

Authors:  John Suler
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav       Date:  2004-06

8.  Mood effects on person-perception judgments.

Authors:  J P Forgas; G H Bower
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-07

9.  Beyond simple pessimism: effects of sadness and anger on social perception.

Authors:  D Keltner; P C Ellsworth; K Edwards
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1993-05

10.  High school students' perceptions of motivations for cyberbullying: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Kris Varjas; Jasmaine Talley; Joel Meyers; Leandra Parris; Hayley Cutts
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-08
View more
  11 in total

1.  Modeling Interdependent and Periodic Real-World Action Sequences.

Authors:  Takeshi Kurashima; Tim Althoff; Jure Leskovec
Journal:  Proc Int World Wide Web Conf       Date:  2018-04

2.  Prevalence and Psychological Effects of Hateful Speech in Online College Communities.

Authors:  Koustuv Saha; Eshwar Chandrasekharan; Munmun De Choudhury
Journal:  Proc ACM Web Sci Conf       Date:  2019-06

Review 3.  Netiquette for social media engagement for oncology professionals.

Authors:  Sara Beltrán Ponce; Maura M Barry; Don S Dizon; Matthew S Katz; Martina Murphy; Eleonora Teplinsky; Stacey Tinianov; Deanna J Attai; Merry Jennifer Markham
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.674

4.  Public comment sentiment on educational videos: Understanding the effects of presenter gender, video format, threading, and moderation on YouTube TED talk comments.

Authors:  George Veletsianos; Royce Kimmons; Ross Larsen; Tonia A Dousay; Patrick R Lowenthal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Measuring the Outreach Efforts of Public Health Authorities and the Public Response on Facebook During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Early 2020: Cross-Country Comparison.

Authors:  Aravind Sesagiri Raamkumar; Soon Guan Tan; Hwee Lin Wee
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 6.  How We Do Things With Words: Analyzing Text as Social and Cultural Data.

Authors:  Dong Nguyen; Maria Liakata; Simon DeDeo; Jacob Eisenstein; David Mimno; Rebekah Tromble; Jane Winters
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2020-08-25

7.  Controversy around climate change reports: a case study of Twitter responses to the 2019 IPCC report on land.

Authors:  Mary Sanford; James Painter; Taha Yasseri; Jamie Lorimer
Journal:  Clim Change       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 4.743

8.  Citation impact and social media visibility of Great Barrington and John Snow signatories for COVID-19 strategy.

Authors:  John P Ioannidis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Topic-driven toxicity: Exploring the relationship between online toxicity and news topics.

Authors:  Joni Salminen; Sercan Sengün; Juan Corporan; Soon-Gyo Jung; Bernard J Jansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Predictive Utility of Reward-Based Motives Underlying Excessive and Problematic Social Networking Site Use.

Authors:  Michael Wadsley; Judith Covey; Niklas Ihssen
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2021-06-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.