Literature DB >> 25839968

E-mail to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Within Social Networks: Acceptability and Content.

Sarah L Cutrona1, Joann Wagner, Douglas W Roblin, Bridget Gaglio, Andrew Williams, Rosalie Torres-Stone, Kathleen M Mazor.   

Abstract

Effective techniques to encourage colorectal cancer screening in underscreened populations have included social support interventions and e-mail reminders from physicians. Personalized e-mail messages to promote colorectal cancer screening within social networks could be even more effective but have not been studied. The authors interviewed 387 e-mail users, aged 42-73 years in Georgia, Hawaii, and Massachusetts. Participants were asked to edit a sample message in which the sender shares a recent colonoscopy experience and urges the recipient to discuss colorectal cancer screening with a doctor. For those reporting willingness to send this message, changes to the message and suggested subject lines were recorded. Edited text was analyzed for content and concordance with original message. The majority of participants (74.4%) were willing to e-mail a modifiable message. Of those willing, 63.5% edited the message. Common edits included deletion (17.7%) or modification (17.4%) of a negatively framed sentence on colon cancer risks and addition or modification of personalizing words (15.6%). Few edits changed the meaning of the message (5.6%), and even fewer introduced factual inaccuracies (1.7%). Modifiable e-mail messages offer a way for screened individuals to promote colorectal cancer screening to social network members. The accuracy and effects of such messages should be further studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25839968      PMCID: PMC4822700          DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1012238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  45 in total

1.  The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment.

Authors:  Damon Centola
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Cognitive mediators linking social support networks to colorectal cancer screening adherence.

Authors:  Keiko Honda; Marjorie Kagawa-Singer
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-08-04

3.  Dissemination 2.0: closing the gap between knowledge and practice with new media and marketing.

Authors:  Jay M Bernhardt; Darren Mays; Matthew W Kreuter
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011

4.  Health behavior interventions in the age of facebook.

Authors:  Nathan K Cobb; Amanda L Graham
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Primary care patients' understanding of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Anthony Greisinger; Sarah T Hawley; Judy L Bettencourt; Catherine A Perz; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2006-02-02

6.  Social media-delivered sexual health intervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sheana S Bull; Deborah K Levine; Sandra R Black; Sarah J Schmiege; John Santelli
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  The association between social networks and colorectal cancer screening in American males and females: data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Jiali Ye; Shanita D Williams; Zhiheng Xu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Impact of breast self-examination planned educational messages on social network communications: an exploratory study.

Authors:  J Gravell; J G Zapka; J A Mamon
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1985

9.  Mechanisms underpinning effective peer support: a qualitative analysis of interactions between expert peers and patients newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Judith G Proudfoot; Amisha Jayawant; Alexis E Whitton; Gordon Parker; Vijaya Manicavasagar; Meg Smith; Jennifer Nicholas
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.630

10.  Online social networks and smoking cessation: a scientific research agenda.

Authors:  Nathan K Cobb; Amanda L Graham; M Justin Byron; Raymond S Niaura; David B Abrams
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  3 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer prevention: Perspectives of key players from social networks in a low-income rural US region.

Authors:  Nancy E Schoenberg; Kathryn Eddens; Adam Jonas; Claire Snell-Rood; Christina R Studts; Benjamin Broder-Oldach; Mira L Katz
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2016-02-22

Review 2.  How Social Networks May Influence Cancer Patients' Situated Identity and Illness-Related Behaviors.

Authors:  Eric C Jones; Martin Storksdieck; Maria L Rangel
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-09-04

3.  The Effect of Educational Intervention Based on Health Belief Model and Social Support on the Rate of Participation of Individuals in Performing Fecal Occult Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening

Authors:  Yousef Gholampour; Atefeh Jaderipour; Ali Khani Jeihooni; Seyyed Mansour Kashfi; Pooyan Afzali Harsini
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-10-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.