Literature DB >> 20804288

Tracking the time course of orthographic information in spoken-word recognition.

Anne Pier Salverda1, Michael K Tanenhaus.   

Abstract

Two visual-world experiments evaluated the time course and use of orthographic information in spoken-word recognition using printed words as referents. Participants saw 4 words on a computer screen and listened to spoken sentences instructing them to click on one of the words (e.g., Click on the word bead). The printed words appeared 200 ms before the onset of the spoken target word. In Experiment 1, the display included the target word and a competitor with either a lower degree (e.g., bear) or a higher degree (e.g., bean) of phonological overlap with the target. Both competitors had the same degree of orthographic overlap with the target. There were more fixations to the competitors than to unrelated distractors. Crucially, the likelihood of fixating a competitor did not vary as a function of the amount of phonological overlap between target and competitor. In Experiment 2, the display included the target word and a competitor with either a lower degree (e.g., bare) or a higher degree (e.g., bear) of orthographic overlap with the target. Competitors were homophonous and thus had the same degree of phonological overlap with the target. There were more fixations to higher overlap competitors than to lower overlap competitors, beginning during the temporal interval where initial fixations driven by the vowel are expected to occur. The authors conclude that orthographic information is rapidly activated as a spoken word unfolds and is immediately used in mapping spoken words onto potential printed referents. (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20804288      PMCID: PMC2933075          DOI: 10.1037/a0019901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  26 in total

Review 1.  Perceptual symbol systems.

Authors:  L W Barsalou
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge.

Authors:  L K. Tyler; H E. Moss
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-12

4.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes.

Authors:  Michael W Harm; Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Effects of prosodically modulated sub-phonetic variation on lexical competition.

Authors:  Anne Pier Salverda; Delphine Dahan; Michael K Tanenhaus; Katherine Crosswhite; Mikhail Masharov; Joyce McDonough
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-11

6.  On-line activation of orthography in spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Laetitia Perre; Johannes C Ziegler
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Heeding the voice of experience: the role of talker variation in lexical access.

Authors:  Sarah C Creel; Richard N Aslin; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-05-15

8.  Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  M K Tanenhaus; M J Spivey-Knowlton; K M Eberhard; J C Sedivy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Tracking recognition of spoken words by tracking looks to printed words.

Authors:  James M McQueen; Malte C Viebahn
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Tracking the time course of phonetic cue integration during spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Meghan A Clayards; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-12
View more
  19 in total

1.  Abstract Conceptual Feature Ratings Predict Gaze Within Written Word Arrays: Evidence From a Visual Wor(l)d Paradigm.

Authors:  Silvia Primativo; Jamie Reilly; Sebastian J Crutch
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-02-22

2.  English Listeners Use Suprasegmental Cues to Lexical Stress Early During Spoken-Word Recognition.

Authors:  Alexandra Jesse; Katja Poellmann; Ying-Yee Kong
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Orthographic consistency affects spoken word recognition at different grain-sizes.

Authors:  Nadya Dich
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2014-04

4.  Speech-perception training for older adults with hearing loss impacts word recognition and effort.

Authors:  Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Stephanie L Cute; Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  The nature of the visual environment induces implicit biases during language-mediated visual search.

Authors:  Falk Huettig; James M McQueen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-08

6.  Interpreting prosodic cues in discourse context.

Authors:  Meredith Brown; Anne Pier Salverda; Christine Gunlogson; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  Differential recruitment of executive control regions during phonological competition in monolinguals and bilinguals.

Authors:  Viorica Marian; Sarah Chabal; James Bartolotti; Kailyn Bradley; Arturo E Hernandez
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Kenneth I Vaden; Stephanie L Cute; Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Visual attention shift to printed words during spoken word recognition in Chinese: The role of phonological information.

Authors:  Wei Shen; Qingqing Qu; Xiuhong Tong
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-05

10.  Immediate effects of anticipatory coarticulation in spoken-word recognition.

Authors:  Anne Pier Salverda; Dave Kleinschmidt; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.