Literature DB >> 20803259

Scientific research and the public trust.

David B Resnik1.   

Abstract

This essay analyzes the concept of public trust in science and offers some guidance for ethicists, scientists, and policymakers who use this idea defend ethical rules or policies pertaining to the conduct of research. While the notion that public trusts science makes sense in the abstract, it may not be sufficiently focused to support the various rules and policies that authors have tried to derive from it, because the public is not a uniform body with a common set of interests. Well-focused arguments that use public trust to support rules or policies for the conduct of research should specify (a) which public is being referred to (e.g. the general public or a specific public, such as a particular community or group); (b) what this public expects from scientists; (c) how the rule or policy will ensure that these expectations are met; and (d) why is it important to meet these expectations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20803259      PMCID: PMC3151305          DOI: 10.1007/s11948-010-9210-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  24 in total

1.  The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology.

Authors:  M Siegrist
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Conflict of interest and the public trust.

Authors:  C D DeAngelis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Academic medicine as a public trust.

Authors:  S A Schroeder; J S Zones; J A Showstack
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-08-11       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Ethical challenges for the "outside" researcher in community-based participatory research.

Authors:  Meredith Minkler
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2004-12

5.  A new era of unapproved drugs: the case of Abigail Alliance v Von Eschenbach.

Authors:  Peter D Jacobson; Wendy E Parmet
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Trust, The fragile foundation of contemporary biomedical research.

Authors:  N E Kass; J Sugarman; R Faden; M Schoch-Spana
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.683

7.  Effects of disclosing financial interests on attitudes toward clinical research.

Authors:  Kevin P Weinfurt; Mark A Hall; Michaela A Dinan; Venita DePuy; Joëlle Y Friedman; Jennifer S Allsbrook; Jeremy Sugarman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Empirical data about women's attitudes towards a hypothetical pediatric biobank.

Authors:  Alon B Neidich; Josh W Joseph; Carole Ober; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 9.  Terminal illness and access to Phase 1 experimental agents, surgeries and devices: reviewing the ethical arguments.

Authors:  Udo Schüklenk; Christopher Lowry
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 4.291

10.  Trust in health research relationships: accounts of human subjects.

Authors:  Michael McDonald; Anne Townsend; Susan M Cox; Natasha Damiano Paterson; Darquise Lafrenière
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.742

View more
  24 in total

1.  Hype and public trust in science.

Authors:  Zubin Master; David B Resnik
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Defining Nano, Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine: Why Should It Matter?

Authors:  Priya Satalkar; Bernice Simone Elger; David M Shaw
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  From a variety of ethics to the integrity and congruence of research on biodiversity conservation.

Authors:  Claire Lajaunie
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2018-12-27

4.  Returning Results: Let's Be Honest!

Authors:  Bernice S Elger; Eva De Clercq
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2017-02-24

5.  On Some Possible Ramifications of the "Microplastics in Fish" Case.

Authors:  Bor Luen Tang
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Estimating the deep replicability of scientific findings using human and artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Wu Youyou; Brian Uzzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The epistemic integrity of scientific research.

Authors:  Jan De Winter; Laszlo Kosolosky
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 8.  A Review of the Scientific Misconduct Inquiry Process, Ankara Chamber of Medicine, Turkey.

Authors:  Banu Gökçay; Berna Arda
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  The Enduring Influence of a Dangerous Narrative: How Scientists Can Mitigate the Frankenstein Myth.

Authors:  Peter Nagy; Ruth Wylie; Joey Eschrich; Ed Finn
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 1.352

10.  Promoting public trust: ESCROs won't fix the problem of stem cell tourism.

Authors:  Zubin Master; David B Resnik
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 11.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.