Literature DB >> 33717295

From a variety of ethics to the integrity and congruence of research on biodiversity conservation.

Claire Lajaunie1,2.   

Abstract

This article aims to find the elements that are required for a common ethical approach that is suitable for the different perspectives adopted in integrative biodiversity conservation research. A general reflection on the integrity of research is a priority worldwide, with a common aim to promote good research practice. Beyond the relationship between researcher and research subject, the integrity of research is considered in a broader perspective which entails scientific integrity towards society. In research involving a variety of disciplines and a diversity of legal and ethical frameworks, there is a need of harmony between different sets of values. The notion of congruence (or more pragmatically, alignment) reflects the consistency of ethics in research within the biodiversity conservation's community of researchers. It also bears on the coherence of values shared between the scientific community and society. We examine the notion of research integrity in a broad sense. This examination is to be conducted in relation to the goal of protecting ecological integrity, which is at the core of biodiversity conservation. The notion of integrity constraints should be investigated further to develop a pragmatic response to the need for integrity and congruence in research for biodiversity conservation. © National University of Singapore and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018.

Keywords:  Biodiversity conservation; Ecological integrity; Ethical congruence; Research integrity; Values alignment

Year:  2018        PMID: 33717295      PMCID: PMC7747400          DOI: 10.1007/s41649-018-0072-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev        ISSN: 1793-9453


  16 in total

1.  Scientific integrity, misconduct in science.

Authors:  Emilio Bossi
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 2.193

2.  Move it or lose it? The ecological ethics of relocating species under climate change.

Authors:  Ben A Minteer; James P Collins
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.657

3.  The value of value congruence.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Edwards; Daniel M Cable
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2009-05

4.  Ecological ethics in captivity: balancing values and responsibilities in zoo and aquarium research under rapid global change.

Authors:  Ben A Minteer; James P Collins
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2013

5.  Defending the scientific integrity of conservation-policy processes.

Authors:  Carlos Carroll; Brett Hartl; Gretchen T Goldman; Daniel J Rohlf; Adrian Treves; Jeremy T Kerr; Euan G Ritchie; Richard T Kingsford; Katherine E Gibbs; Martine Maron; James E M Watson
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 6.560

6.  Protect the last of the wild.

Authors:  James E M Watson; Oscar Venter; Jasmine Lee; Kendall R Jones; John G Robinson; Hugh P Possingham; James R Allan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The battle for the soul of biodiversity.

Authors:  Ehsan Masood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Pathogens collections, biobanks and related-data in a One Health legal and ethical perspective.

Authors:  Claire Lajaunie; Calvin Wai-Loon Ho
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.234

9.  The Ethical Challenges of Socially Responsible Science.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Kevin C Elliott
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Science, policy, and the transparency of values.

Authors:  Kevin C Elliott; David B Resnik
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.