Literature DB >> 19385755

Trust in health research relationships: accounts of human subjects.

Michael McDonald1, Anne Townsend, Susan M Cox, Natasha Damiano Paterson, Darquise Lafrenière.   

Abstract

TRUST IS FUNDAMENTAL in health research, yet there is little empirical evidence that explores the meaning of trust from the perspective of human subjects. The analysis presented here focuses on how human subjects talked about trust in the in-depth interviews. It emerged from the accounts that trust could not be assumed in the research setting, rather it was portrayed as a dynamic concept, built and easily broken, characterized by reciprocity and negotiation. Human subjects were ambivalent about who, when, what, and how much to trust in the research endeavor. This paper adds a fresh perspective to the literature on trust, and so offers a currently neglected, and little understood dimension to the discourse around health research ethics.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19385755     DOI: 10.1525/jer.2008.3.4.35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  16 in total

1.  Diversity and inclusion in genomic research: why the uneven progress?

Authors:  Amy R Bentley; Shawneequa Callier; Charles N Rotimi
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-07-18

2.  A paradigm for understanding trust and mistrust in medical research: The Community VOICES study.

Authors:  M Smirnoff; I Wilets; D F Ragin; R Adams; J Holohan; R Rhodes; G Winkel; E M Ricci; C Clesca; L D Richardson
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2018-02-16

3.  Enhancing HIV vaccine trial consent preparedness among street drug users.

Authors:  Celia B Fisher
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  Peruvian Female Sex Workers' Ethical Perspectives on Their Participation in an HPV Vaccine Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Brandon Brown; Mariam Davtyan; Celia B Fisher
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2014-08-14

5.  Scientific research and the public trust.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-08-29       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 6.  Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research.

Authors:  Judy Illes; Mary Anne Moser; Jennifer B McCormick; Eric Racine; Sandra Blakeslee; Arthur Caplan; Erika Check Hayden; Jay Ingram; Tiffany Lohwater; Peter McKnight; Christie Nicholson; Anthony Phillips; Kevin D Sauvé; Elaine Snell; Samuel Weiss
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Trust and the Ethical Conduct of Community-Engaged Research.

Authors:  Dmitry Khodyakov; Lisa Mikesell; Elizabeth Bromley
Journal:  Eur J Pers Cent Healthc       Date:  2017

8.  Genomic research and wide data sharing: views of prospective participants.

Authors:  Susan Brown Trinidad; Stephanie M Fullerton; Julie M Bares; Gail P Jarvik; Eric B Larson; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Trust in research physicians as a key dimension of randomized controlled trial participation in clinical addictions research.

Authors:  Kaitlyn Jaffe; Ekaterina Nosova; Kora DeBeck; Kanna Hayashi; M-J Milloy; Lindsey Richardson
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.716

10.  Communications between volunteers and health researchers during recruitment and informed consent: qualitative content analysis of email interactions.

Authors:  Anne Townsend; Zubin Amarsi; Catherine L Backman; Susan M Cox; Linda C Li
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.