Literature DB >> 23160475

In vivo classification of breast masses using features derived from axial-strain and axial-shear images.

Haiyan Xu1, Tomy Varghese, Jingfeng Jiang, James A Zagzebski.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is currently the second leading cause of cancer deaths in women. Early detection and accurate classification of suspicious masses as benign or malignant is important for arriving at an appropriate treatment plan. In this article, we present classification results for features extracted from ultrasound-based, axial-strain and axial-shear images of breast masses. The breast-mass stiffness contrast, size ratio, and a normalized axial-shear strain area feature are evaluated for the classification of in vivo breast masses using a leave-one-out classifier. Radiofrequency echo data from 123 patients were acquired using Siemens Antares or Elegra clinical ultrasound systems during freehand palpation. Data from four different institutions were analyzed. Axial displacements and strains were estimated using a multilevel, pyramid-based two-dimensional cross-correlation algorithm, with final processing block dimensions of 0.385 mm × 0.507 mm (three A-lines). Since mass boundaries on B-mode images for 21 patients could not be delineated (isoechoic), the combined feature analysis was only performed for 102 patients. Results from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) demonstrate that the area under the curve was 0.90, 0.84, and 0.52 for the normalized axial-shear strain, size ratio, and stiffness contrast, respectively. When these three features were combined using a leave-one-out classifier and support vector machine approach, the overall area under the curve improved to 0.93.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23160475      PMCID: PMC3662535          DOI: 10.1177/0161734612465520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrason Imaging        ISSN: 0161-7346            Impact factor:   1.578


  54 in total

1.  Maximum-likelihood approach to strain imaging using ultrasound

Authors: 
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Analysis of shear strain imaging for classifying breast masses: finite element and phantom results.

Authors:  Haiyan Xu; Tomy Varghese; Ernest L Madsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Breast lesions: evaluation with US strain imaging--clinical experience of multiple observers.

Authors:  Dawn M Regner; Gina K Hesley; Nicholas J Hangiandreou; Marilyn J Morton; Michelle R Nordland; Duane D Meixner; Timothy J Hall; Michael A Farrell; Jayawant N Mandrekar; W Scott Harmsen; J William Charboneau
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Timothy J Hall; Amy M Sommer; Gina K Hesley; Gale A Sisney; William E Svensson; Jason P Fine; Jinfeng Jiang; Nicholas J Hangiandreou
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Enhancement of echo-signal correlation in elastography using temporal stretching.

Authors:  T Varghese; J Ophir
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 6.  Comparison of accuracy of diagnostic modalities for evaluation of breast cancer with review of literature.

Authors:  Mulazim Hussain Bukhari; Zahid Mahmood Akhtar
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.582

7.  Tissue response to mechanical vibrations for "sonoelasticity imaging".

Authors:  K J Parker; S R Huang; R A Musulin; R M Lerner
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of "proper" binormal ROC curves.

Authors:  Lorenzo L Pesce; Charles E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Correlation of needle core biopsy with excision histology in screen-detected B3 lesions: the Merrion Breast Screening Unit experience.

Authors:  B D Hayes; A O'Doherty; C M Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Fibroadenoma of the breast: sonomammography correlated with pathology in 122 patients.

Authors:  C Cole-Beuglet; R Z Soriano; A B Kurtz; B B Goldberg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  4 in total

1.  Post-Procedure Evaluation of Microwave Ablations of Hepatocellular Carcinomas Using Electrode Displacement Elastography.

Authors:  Wenjun Yang; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Tomy Varghese; Marci L Alexander; Nicholas Rubert; Atul N Ingle; Meghan G Lubner; James L Hinshaw; Shane A Wells; Fred T Lee; James A Zagzebski
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Modeling Uncertainty of Strain Ratio Measurements in Ultrasound Breast Strain Elastography: A Factorial Experiment.

Authors:  David Rosen; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  A Normalized Shear Deformation Indicator for Ultrasound Strain Elastography in Breast Tissues: An In Vivo Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Jingfeng Jiang; Bo Peng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Cross-Polarization OCT and OCT-Elastography for Differentiation of Breast Cancer Subtypes: Comparative Study.

Authors:  Ekaterina V Gubarkova; Elena B Kiseleva; Marina A Sirotkina; Dmitry A Vorontsov; Ksenia A Achkasova; Sergey S Kuznetsov; Konstantin S Yashin; Aleksander L Matveyev; Aleksander A Sovetsky; Lev A Matveev; Anton A Plekhanov; Alexey Y Vorontsov; Vladimir Y Zaitsev; Natalia D Gladkova
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.