Literature DB >> 20800076

Taste mixture interactions: suppression, additivity, and the predominance of sweetness.

Barry G Green1, Juyun Lim, Floor Osterhoff, Karen Blacher, Danielle Nachtigal.   

Abstract

Most of what is known about taste interactions has come from studies of binary mixtures. The primary goal of this study was to determine whether asymmetries in suppression between stimuli in binary mixtures predict the perception of tastes in more complex mixtures (e.g., ternary and quaternary mixtures). Also of interest was the longstanding question of whether overall taste intensity derives from the sum of the tastes perceived within a mixture (perceptual additivity) or from the sum of the perceived intensities of the individual stimuli (stimulus additivity). Using the general labeled magnitude scale together with a sip-and-spit procedure, we asked subjects to rate overall taste intensity and the sweetness, sourness, saltiness and bitterness of approximately equi-intense sucrose, NaCl, citric acid and QSO(4) stimuli presented alone and in all possible binary, ternary and quaternary mixtures. The results showed a consistent pattern of mixture suppression in which sucrose sweetness tended to be both the least suppressed quality and the strongest suppressor of other tastes. The overall intensity of mixtures was found to be predicted best by perceptual additivity. A second experiment that was designed to rule out potentially confounding effects of the order of taste ratings and the temperature of taste solutions replicated the main findings of the first experiment. Overall, the results imply that mixture suppression favors perception of sweet carbohydrates in foods at the expense of other potentially harmful ingredients, such as high levels of sodium (saltiness) and potential poisons or spoilage (bitterness and sourness).
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20800076      PMCID: PMC2975745          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  28 in total

1.  Taste mixtures: is mixture suppression related to compression?

Authors:  L M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1975-05

2.  'Thermal taste' predicts higher responsiveness to chemical taste and flavor.

Authors:  Barry G Green; Pravin George
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Salt enhances flavour by suppressing bitterness.

Authors:  P A Breslin; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-06-05       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Analysis of taste mixtures by adults and children.

Authors:  N Oram; D G Laing; M H Freeman; I Hutchinson
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.038

5.  Gustatory cross-adaptation: does a single mechanism code the salty taste?

Authors:  D V Smith; D H McBurney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-04

6.  The limited capacity of humans to identify the components of taste mixtures and taste-odour mixtures.

Authors:  David G Laing; Catherine Link; Anthony L Jinks; Ian Hutchinson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Suppression of sourness: a comparative study involving mixtures of organic acids and sugars.

Authors:  Lotika Savant; Mina R McDaniel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-05

8.  Oral zinc sulfate solutions inhibit sweet taste perception.

Authors:  Russell S J Keast; Thomas M Canty; Paul A S Breslin
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  The influence of sodium salts on binary mixtures of bitter-tasting compounds.

Authors:  Russell S J Keast; Thomas M Canty; Paul A S Breslin
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  Modifying the bitterness of selected oral pharmaceuticals with cation and anion series of salts.

Authors:  Russell S J Keast; Paul A S Breslin
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.200

View more
  22 in total

1.  Differences in the chemesthetic subqualities of capsaicin, ibuprofen, and olive oil.

Authors:  Samantha M Bennett; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Effects of selective adaptation on coding sugar and salt tastes in mixtures.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Holly F Goyert; Bradley K Formaker; Thomas P Hettinger
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Enhancement of retronasal odors by taste.

Authors:  Barry G Green; Danielle Nachtigal; Samuel Hammond; Juyun Lim
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Polymorphisms in TRPV1 and TAS2Rs associate with sensations from sampled ethanol.

Authors:  Alissa L Allen; John E McGeary; John E Hayes
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Determinants of taste preference and acceptability: quality versus hedonics.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Ginger D Blonde; Lisa A Eckel; Alan C Spector
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  TRPs in taste and chemesthesis.

Authors:  Stephen D Roper
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2014

7.  Bitter taste phenotype and body weight predict children's selection of sweet and savory foods at a palatable test-meal.

Authors:  Kathleen L Keller; Annemarie Olsen; Terri L Cravener; Rachel Bloom; Wendy K Chung; Liyong Deng; Patricia Lanzano; Karol Meyermann
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.868

8.  Masking the Detection of Taste Stimuli in Rats: NaCl and Sucrose.

Authors:  Ginger D Blonde; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Use of Adult Sensory Panel to Study Individual Differences in the Palatability of a Pediatric HIV Treatment Drug.

Authors:  Julie A Mennella; Phoebe S Mathew; Elizabeth D Lowenthal
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 10.  Why do we like sweet taste: A bitter tale?

Authors:  Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-05-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.