Literature DB >> 21798851

Enhancement of retronasal odors by taste.

Barry G Green1, Danielle Nachtigal, Samuel Hammond, Juyun Lim.   

Abstract

Psychophysical studies of interactions between retronasal olfaction and taste have focused most often on the enhancement of tastes by odors, which has been attributed primarily to a response bias (i.e., halo dumping). Based upon preliminary evidence that retronasal odors could also be enhanced by taste, the present study measured both forms of enhancement using appropriate response categories. In the first experiment, subjects rated taste ("sweet," "sour," "salty," and "bitter") and odor ("other") intensity for aqueous samples of 3 tastants (sucrose, NaCl, and citric acid) and 3 odorants (vanillin, citral, and furaneol), both alone and in taste-odor mixtures. The results showed that sucrose, but not the other taste stimuli, significantly increased the perceived intensity of all 3 odors. Enhancement of tastes by odors was inconsistent and generally weaker than enhancement of odors by sucrose. A second experiment used a flavored beverage and a custard dessert to test whether the findings from the first experiment would hold for the perception of actual foods. Adding sucrose significantly enhanced the intensity of "cherry" and "vanilla" flavors, whereas adding vanillin did not significantly enhance the intensity of sweetness. It is proposed that enhancement of retronasal odors by a sweet stimulus results from an adaptive sensory mechanism that serves to increase the salience of the flavor of nutritive foods.
© The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21798851      PMCID: PMC3243899          DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjr068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  30 in total

1.  Confusing tastes and smells: how odours can influence the perception of sweet and sour tastes.

Authors:  R J Stevenson; J Prescott; R A Boakes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Resistance to extinction of conditioned odor perceptions: evaluative conditioning is not unique.

Authors:  R J Stevenson; R A Boakes; J P Wilson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Is sweetness taste enhancement cognitively impenetrable? Effects of exposure, training and knowledge.

Authors:  R J Stevenson
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  The acquisition of odour qualities.

Authors:  R J Stevenson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-05

5.  Odor-taste interactions: effects of attentional strategies during exposure.

Authors:  John Prescott; Victoria Johnstone; Joanne Francis
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Controlled continuous flow delivery system for investigating taste-aroma interactions.

Authors:  Joanne Hort; Tracey Ann Hollowood
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 5.279

7.  Potential mechanisms of retronasal odor referral to the mouth.

Authors:  Juyun Lim; Maxwell B Johnson
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Mutual action of taste and olfaction.

Authors:  C Murphy; W S Cain; L M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1977-05

9.  Taste and olfaction: independence vs interaction.

Authors:  C Murphy; W S Cain
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1980-03

10.  Fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in male and female rats: effects of sweet taste and sugar concentration.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.868

View more
  22 in total

1.  Experience-Dependent c-Fos Expression in the Mediodorsal Thalamus Varies With Chemosensory Modality.

Authors:  Kelly E Fredericksen; Kelsey A McQueen; Chad L Samuelsen
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Experience Informs Consummatory Choices for Congruent and Incongruent Odor-Taste Mixtures in Rats.

Authors:  Kelsey A McQueen; Kelly E Fredericksen; Chad L Samuelsen
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Adaptive weighting of taste and odor cues during flavor choice.

Authors:  Joost X Maier; Victoria E Elliott
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Single-neuron responses to intraoral delivery of odor solutions in primary olfactory and gustatory cortex.

Authors:  Joost X Maier
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Interactions of Lemon, Sucrose and Citric Acid in Enhancing Citrus, Sweet and Sour Flavors.

Authors:  Maria G Veldhuizen; Ashik Siddique; Sage Rosenthal; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-12-25       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Mammalian Taste Cells Express Functional Olfactory Receptors.

Authors:  Bilal Malik; Nadia Elkaddi; Jumanah Turkistani; Andrew I Spielman; Mehmet Hakan Ozdener
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Temperature Affects Human Sweet Taste via At Least Two Mechanisms.

Authors:  Barry G Green; Danielle Nachtigal
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Flavor Alterations Associated with Miracle Fruit and Gymnema sylvestre.

Authors:  Sonia D Hudson; Charles A Sims; Asli Z Odabasi; Thomas A Colquhoun; Derek J Snyder; Jennifer J Stamps; Shawn C Dotson; Lorenzo Puentes; Linda M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Experience-dependent c-Fos expression in the primary chemosensory cortices of the rat.

Authors:  Sanaya Bamji-Stocke; Bradley T Biggs; Chad L Samuelsen
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Perceptual and Brain Response to Odors Is Associated with Body Mass Index and Postprandial Total Ghrelin Reactivity to a Meal.

Authors:  Xue Sun; Maria G Veldhuizen; Amanda E Babbs; Rajita Sinha; Dana M Small
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.160

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.