Literature DB >> 1453966

Descriptions and depictions of environments.

H A Taylor1, B Tversky.   

Abstract

Subjects studied maps with the expectation that they would draw or describe them from memory. In fact, subjects did both. Order of drawing or describing landmarks revealed the mental organization of environments. Organization was quite similar across maps and descriptions of the same environments, revealing hierarchical structures based on spatial and functional features of the environments and on conventions for sequencing the landmarks.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1453966     DOI: 10.3758/bf03199581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  7 in total

1.  Subjective organization in free recall of "unrelated" words.

Authors:  E TULVING
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1962-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  A study in language and cognition.

Authors:  R W BROWN; E H LENNEBERG
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1954-07

3.  Perceptual and conceptual factors in distortions in memory for graphs and maps.

Authors:  B Tversky; D J Schiano
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1989-12

4.  Mental representations of spatial relations.

Authors:  T P McNamara
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Impact of learning to read on directionality in perception: a further cross-cultural analysis.

Authors:  S Kugelmass; A Lieblich
Journal:  Hum Dev       Date:  1979

6.  Distortions in judged spatial relations.

Authors:  A Stevens; P Coupe
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps.

Authors:  S C Hirtle; J Jonides
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-05
  7 in total
  19 in total

1.  Goal-specific influences on the representation of spatial perspective.

Authors:  H A Taylor; S J Naylor; N A Chechile
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-03

2.  The interaction of spatial reference frames and hierarchical object representations: evidence from figure copying in hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  M Behrmann; D C Plaut
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Preferences for ascending and descending hierarchical organization in spatial communication.

Authors:  J M Plumert; T L Spalding; P Nichols-Whitehead
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-03

4.  The construction of spatial situation models during reading.

Authors:  Yves Bestgen; Vincent Dupont
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-01-10

Review 5.  Mental models, pictures, and text: integration of spatial and verbal information.

Authors:  A M Glenberg; M A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-09

6.  North is up(hill): route planning heuristics in real-world environments.

Authors:  Tad T Brunyé; Caroline R Mahoney; Aaron L Gardony; Holly A Taylor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-09

7.  Preferred mental models in reasoning about spatial relations.

Authors:  Georg Jahn; Markus Knauff; P N Johnson-Laird
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

8.  Cognitive tools shape thought: diagrams in design.

Authors:  Jeffrey V Nickerson; James E Corter; Barbara Tversky; Yun-Jin Rho; Doris Zahner; Lixiu Yu
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-02-15

9.  Non-sensory inputs to angular path integration.

Authors:  Joeanna C Arthur; John W Philbeck; David Chichka
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.435

10.  Verbalizing, visualizing, and navigating: The effect of strategies on encoding a large-scale virtual environment.

Authors:  David J M Kraemer; Victor R Schinazi; Philip B Cawkwell; Anand Tekriwal; Russell A Epstein; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.