Literature DB >> 20720093

Time and intensity factors in identification of components of odor mixtures.

Marion E Frank1, Holly F Goyert, Thomas P Hettinger.   

Abstract

Identification of odors of compounds introduced into changeable olfactory environments is the essence of olfactory coding, which focuses perception on the latest stimulus with the greatest salience. Effects of stimulus intensity and adapting time on mixture component identification after adapting with one component were each studied in 10 human subjects. Odors of 1 and 5 mM vanillin (vanilla) and phenethyl alcohol (rose) were identified, with adapting time varied by sniffing naturally once or twice, or sniffing 5 times, once every 2 s. Odors of water-adapted single compounds were identified nearly perfectly (94%), self-adapted to 51% but did not cross-adapt (94%), showing the 2 compounds had quickly adapting independent odors. Identifications of the vanilla and rose odors in water-adapted mixtures were reduced to 59% and 79%, respectively. Following single-component adaptation, the average 33% identification of odors of adapted (ambient) mixture components contrasted with the greater average 86% identification of new unadapted (extra) mixture components. Identifications were lower for 1 than 5 mM components when concentrations were not matched, and ambient component identifications were lower after 10-s adaptation than after 1 or 2 sniffs. Rapid selective adaptation and mixture component suppression manipulate effective intensity to promote emergence of characteristic odor qualities in dynamic natural settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20720093      PMCID: PMC2955077          DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjq078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  53 in total

1.  Processing of odorous signals in humans.

Authors:  I Savic
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Taste mixtures: is mixture suppression related to compression?

Authors:  L M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1975-05

Review 3.  Calcium, the two-faced messenger of olfactory transduction and adaptation.

Authors:  Hugh R Matthews; Johannes Reisert
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Correspondence between three olfactory tests and suprathreshold odor intensity ratings.

Authors:  Sari Koskinen; Seija Vento; Henrik Malmberg; Hely Tuorila
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Combinatorial effects of odorant mixes in olfactory cortex.

Authors:  Zhihua Zou; Linda B Buck
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Dendritic processing within olfactory bulb circuits.

Authors:  Nathan E Schoppa; Nathan N Urban
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  Quality and intensity of binary odor mixtures.

Authors:  D G Laing; H Panhuber; M E Willcox; E A Pittman
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1984-08

8.  Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans.

Authors:  R L Doty; W E Brugger; P C Jurs; M A Orndorff; P J Snyder; L D Lowry
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1978-02

9.  Olfactory self- and cross-adaptation: effects of time of adaptation on perceived odor intensity.

Authors:  B Berglund; U Berglund; T Lindvall
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1978-09

10.  Natural sniffing gives optimum odour perception for humans.

Authors:  D G Laing
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  7 in total

1.  An axis of good and awful in odor reception.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Thomas P Hettinger
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Effects of selective adaptation on coding sugar and salt tastes in mixtures.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Holly F Goyert; Bradley K Formaker; Thomas P Hettinger
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Amiloride-sensitive and amiloride-insensitive responses to NaCl + acid mixtures in hamster chorda tympani nerve.

Authors:  Bradley K Formaker; Thomas P Hettinger; Lawrence D Savoy; Marion E Frank
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Recognition of the Component Odors in Mixtures.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Dane B Fletcher; Thomas P Hettinger
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 5.  The perception of odor objects in everyday life: a review on the processing of odor mixtures.

Authors:  Thierry Thomas-Danguin; Charlotte Sinding; Sébastien Romagny; Fouzia El Mountassir; Boriana Atanasova; Elodie Le Berre; Anne-Marie Le Bon; Gérard Coureaud
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-02

6.  An odor interaction model of binary odorant mixtures by a partial differential equation method.

Authors:  Luchun Yan; Jiemin Liu; Guihua Wang; Chuandong Wu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 7.  Tracking traumatic head injuries with the chemical senses.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Thomas P Hettinger
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-03-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.