Literature DB >> 20714720

Development of a three-dimensional detection method of cam deformities in femoroacetabular impingement.

Emmanuel A Audenaert1, Nick Baelde, Wouter Huysse, Lara Vigneron, Christophe Pattyn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The description of femoral head sphericity and related risk for femoroacetabularimpingement is currently limited to an angular estimate-the alpha angle-whose relevance and accuracy have been challenged. We developed a three-dimensional approach for both automated digital measurement of the alpha angle and the detection of camdeformities. Accuracy and diagnostic relevance of the alpha angle estimated by means of the oblique axial and multiple radial plane protocol were compared with the computed results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using subject-specific statistical information of the femur head and mid-neck region, a method was developed to accurately compute the maximum alpha angle and to define aspherical eccentric areas at the femoral head-neck junction. The method was evaluated on 102 dry cadaver femur specimens.
RESULTS: Average detection limit for bony prominences at the head-neck transition was 0.98 mm. Pixel size of the investigated CT data was 0.79 mm. Mean maximum computed alpha angle of the femurs with cam-type morphology as identified by the morphological method was 67.72° (range 53.04-88.02°). Mean maximum computed alpha angle of the femurs without cam deformity was 47.65° (range 38.67-59.81°). Alpha angle estimates obtained by means of the multiple radial plane protocol correlated better (R = 0.88) and showed higher diagnostic agreement (phi = 0.77) with the 3D computational analysis compared to the oblique axial protocol (R = 0.60; phi = 0.67).
CONCLUSIONS: The alpha angle seems to be a relevant screening tool when obtained by 3D computed analysis or when estimated according to the multiple radial plane protocol. Estimates obtained by means of the oblique axial protocol have insufficient diagnostic and measurement accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20714720     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-010-1021-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  18 in total

Review 1.  Current opinion on computer-aided surgical navigation and robotics: role in the treatment of sports-related injuries.

Authors:  Volker Musahl; Anton Plakseychuk; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Femoral neck shape and the spatial distribution of its mineral mass varies with its size: Clinical and biomechanical implications.

Authors:  Roger M D Zebaze; Anthony Jones; Findlay Welsh; Mark Knackstedt; Ego Seeman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  The concept of femoroacetabular impingement: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Michael Leunig; Paul E Beaulé; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Femoroacetabular impingement: can the alpha angle be estimated?

Authors:  Mohamed R Nouh; Mark E Schweitzer; Leon Rybak; Jodi Cohen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Cam-type femoral-acetabular impingement: is the alpha angle the best MR arthrography has to offer?

Authors:  Derek G Lohan; Leanne L Seeger; Kambiz Motamedi; Sharon Hame; James Sayre
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal femur in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis based on computed tomography.

Authors:  J Kordelle; M Millis; F A Jolesz; R Kikinis; J A Richolt
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.324

Review 7.  Imaging findings of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Douglas P Beall; Clifford F Sweet; Hal D Martin; Craig L Lastine; David E Grayson; Justin Q Ly; Jon R Fish
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Evaluation of CT scans and 3-D reformatted images for quantitative assessment of the hip.

Authors:  M F Abel; D H Sutherland; D R Wenger; S J Mubarak
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

Review 9.  Osseous abnormalities and early osteoarthritis: the role of hip impingement.

Authors:  Michael Tanzer; Nicolas Noiseux
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Relationship between offset angle alpha and hip chondral injury in femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Todd L Johnston; Mara L Schenker; Karen K Briggs; Marc J Philippon
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  12 in total

1.  A perspective on femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Thomas C B Pollard
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Detection of femoroplasty on pre- and post-arthroscopic comparison radiographs following treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: multi-reader accuracy and agreement study.

Authors:  Steffen J Haider; Alan H Siegel; Kevin F Spratt; James B Ames; J Allen Graham; Yvonne Y Cheung
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  3DMR osseous reconstructions of the shoulder using a gradient-echo based two-point Dixon reconstruction: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Soterios Gyftopoulos; Avner Yemin; Thomas Mulholland; Michael Bloom; Pippa Storey; Christian Geppert; Michael P Recht
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Statistical shape modeling of cam femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Michael D Harris; Manasi Datar; Ross T Whitaker; Elizabeth R Jurrus; Christopher L Peters; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Reliability and correlation analysis of computed methods to convert conventional 2D radiological hindfoot measurements to a 3D setting using weightbearing CT.

Authors:  A Burssens; J Peeters; M Peiffer; R Marien; T Lenaerts; G Vandeputte; J Victor
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Preliminary evaluation of an MRI-based technique for displaying and quantifying bony deformities in cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Xiumei Kang; Honglin Zhang; Donald Garbuz; David R Wilson; Antony J Hodgson
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Three-dimensional quantification of femoral head shape in controls and patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Michael D Harris; Shawn P Reese; Christopher L Peters; Jeffrey A Weiss; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Three-Dimensional Quantification of Cam Resection Using MRI Bone Models: A Comparison of 2 Techniques.

Authors:  Thomas D Alter; Derrick M Knapik; Martina Guidetti; Alejandro Espinoza; Jorge Chahla; Shane J Nho; Philip Malloy
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-06

9.  Cam deformity and the omega angle, a novel quantitative measurement of femoral head-neck morphology: a 3D CT gender analysis in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Vasco V Mascarenhas; Paulo Rego; Pedro Dantas; Augusto Gaspar; Francisco Soldado; José G Consciência
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  The simplest method to classify CAM lesions.

Authors:  Ricci Plastow; Zuned Hakim; Max Fehily; Alun Wall
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2016-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.