Literature DB >> 23549935

Preliminary evaluation of an MRI-based technique for displaying and quantifying bony deformities in cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Xiumei Kang1, Honglin Zhang, Donald Garbuz, David R Wilson, Antony J Hodgson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Characterizing aspheric deformities of the femoral head-neck junction in cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) requires representing the location, size, or extent of the bony lesion. The objectives of this work are to (1) assess the feasibility of creating 3D models of cam deformities from MRI sets, (2) present a standardized 2D visualization of the lesion, and (3) present and evaluate the potential utility of summary metrics in distinguishing between FAI patients and control subjects.
METHODS: Using MRIs from five subjects with diagnosed cam-type FAI and four healthy subjects, we developed a technique based on subtracting an estimated normal surface from each subject's actual bone surface in order to generate a subject-specific 2D "diagnosis graph" that characterized the femoral deformity. The models from three control subjects were combined to create the baseline model.
RESULTS: The RMS fitting error between the surface models of individual control subjects and their corresponding baseline models was 1.05 mm across the head and the head-to-neck transition region. In the anterosuperior region of the 2D diagnosis graphs, the mean height of the detected cam deformities relative to the estimated baseline normal shape was 17.9 % of the head radius for the five FAI subjects (95 % CI 8.5-27.3 %) and 7.0 % (95 % CI 2.9-11.1 %) for the four control subjects. A binary logistic regression analysis indicated that an h/r ratio larger than a threshold of [Formula: see text] = 10.7 % (equivalent to approximately 2.3 mm in height) yielded the best discrimination between cam-type FAI subjects and normal subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: Our 2D diagnosis graph qualitatively enabled the cam-type lesions in four of our five diagnosed patients to be clearly visualized on MRI-derived models. We believe this visualization tool may be helpful in better characterizing cam-type lesions for diagnosis and for developing more precise plans for surgical treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23549935     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-013-0837-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  16 in total

Review 1.  Femoroacetabular impingement--diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Kevin M Kaplan; Mehul R Shah; Thomas Youm
Journal:  Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis       Date:  2010

2.  The shape of the acetabular cartilage surface and its role in hip joint contact stress.

Authors:  Dong-Yun Gu; Ke-Rong Dai; Fei Hu; Ya-Zhu Chen
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2010

3.  Evaluation of a computed tomography-based navigation system prototype for hip arthroscopy in the treatment of femoroacetabular cam impingement.

Authors:  Alexander Brunner; Monika Horisberger; Richard F Herzog
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Cam-type femoral-acetabular impingement: is the alpha angle the best MR arthrography has to offer?

Authors:  Derek G Lohan; Leanne L Seeger; Kambiz Motamedi; Sharon Hame; James Sayre
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  A method for three-dimensional evaluation and computer aided treatment of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  E Audenaert; L Vigneron; C Pattyn
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2011-03-28

Review 6.  Imaging findings of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Douglas P Beall; Clifford F Sweet; Hal D Martin; Craig L Lastine; David E Grayson; Justin Q Ly; Jon R Fish
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: an underrecognized cause of hip pain and premature osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Graham D Reid; Callum G Reid; Nadia Widmer; Peter L Munk
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 4.666

8.  Development of a three-dimensional detection method of cam deformities in femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Audenaert; Nick Baelde; Wouter Huysse; Lara Vigneron; Christophe Pattyn
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Prevalence of cam and pincer-type deformities on hip MRI in an asymptomatic young Swiss female population: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  M Leunig; P Jüni; S Werlen; A Limacher; E Nüesch; C W Pfirrmann; S Trelle; A Odermatt; W Hofstetter; R Ganz; S Reichenbach
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Relationship between offset angle alpha and hip chondral injury in femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Todd L Johnston; Mara L Schenker; Karen K Briggs; Marc J Philippon
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  2 in total

1.  Femoroacetabular impingement with chronic acetabular rim fracture - 3D computed tomography, 3D magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic correlation.

Authors:  Avneesh Chhabra; Shaun Nordeck; Vibhor Wadhwa; Sai Madhavapeddi; William J Robertson
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-07-18

2.  Automated volumetric and statistical shape assessment of cam-type morphology of the femoral head-neck region from clinical 3D magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Jessica M Bugeja; Ying Xia; Shekhar S Chandra; Nicholas J Murphy; Jillian Eyles; Libby Spiers; Stuart Crozier; David J Hunter; Jurgen Fripp; Craig Engstrom
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.