Literature DB >> 29110048

Detection of femoroplasty on pre- and post-arthroscopic comparison radiographs following treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: multi-reader accuracy and agreement study.

Steffen J Haider1, Alan H Siegel2, Kevin F Spratt3, James B Ames4, J Allen Graham5, Yvonne Y Cheung6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess diagnostic accuracy and agreement among radiologists in detecting femoroplasty on pre- and post-arthroscopic comparison frog lateral and anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs after treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, 86 patients underwent hip arthroscopy (52 with and 34 without femoroplasty) for treatment of FAI syndrome. Three radiologists blinded to clinical data and chronological order of the pre- and post-arthroscopic comparison radiographs independently examined AP pelvis and frog lateral radiographs to detect femoroplasty changes. Statistical analysis outputs included diagnostic accuracy parameters and inter- and intra-observer agreement.
RESULTS: Identification of femoroplasty in the frog lateral projection has mean sensitivity 70%, specificity 82%, inter-observer agreement κ 0.74-0.76 and intra-observer agreement κ 0.72-0.85. Using the AP pelvis projection to detect femoroplasty has mean sensitivity 32%, specificity 71%, inter-observer agreement κ 0.47-0.65, and intra-observer agreement κ, 0.56-0.84.
CONCLUSIONS: Radiologists are only moderately sensitive, though more specific, in femoroplasty detection in the frog lateral projection. The AP pelvis projection yields lower sensitivity and specificity. Both projections have moderate inter- and intra-observer agreement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cam morphology; FAI; Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome; Femoroplasty; Hip arthroscopy; Radiography

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29110048     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-017-2789-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  27 in total

1.  Eighty percent of patients with surgical hip dislocation for femoroacetabular impingement have a good clinical result without osteoarthritis progression at 10 years.

Authors:  Simon D Steppacher; Helen Anwander; Corinne A Zurmühle; Moritz Tannast; Klaus A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed.

Authors:  Jan Kottner; Laurent Audigé; Stig Brorson; Allan Donner; Byron J Gajewski; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Chris Roberts; Mohamed Shoukri; David L Streiner
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Alpha angle correction in femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Darren de Sa; Nathan Urquhart; Marc Philippon; Jung-Eum Ye; Nicole Simunovic; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Patient-initiated electronic health record amendment requests.

Authors:  David A Hanauer; Rebecca Preib; Kai Zheng; Sung W Choi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Residual deformity is the most common reason for revision hip arthroscopy: a three-dimensional CT study.

Authors:  James R Ross; Christopher M Larson; Olusanjo Adeoye; Olusanjo Adeoyo; Bryan T Kelly; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The False-Profile View May Be Used to Identify Cam Morphology.

Authors:  Michael D Hellman; Randy Mascarenhas; Anil Gupta; Yale Fillingham; Bryan D Haughom; Michael J Salata; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Does the femoral cam lesion regrow after osteoplasty for femoroacetabular impingement? Two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Asheesh Gupta; John M Redmond; Christine E Stake; Nathan A Finch; Kevin F Dunne; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 8.  Consistency of reported outcomes after arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Bandar M Hetaimish; Moin Khan; Sarah Crouch; Nicole Simunovic; Asheesh Bedi; Nicholas Mohtadi; Mohit Bhandari; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Imaging to Treat Cam Deformities: Correlation With 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography.

Authors:  James R Ross; Asheesh Bedi; Rebecca M Stone; Elizabeth Sibilsky Enselman; Michael Leunig; Bryan T Kelly; Christopher M Larson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Arthroscopic offset restoration in femoroacetabular cam impingement: accuracy and early clinical outcome.

Authors:  Lisca Stähelin; Thomas Stähelin; Brigitte M Jolles; Richard F Herzog
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  1 in total

1.  Prevalence of Cam and Pincer Deformities in the X-Rays of Asymptomatic Individuals.

Authors:  Steffen Thier; Daniel Gerisch; Christel Weiss; Stefan Fickert; Alexander Brunner
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 3.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.