Steffen J Haider1, Alan H Siegel2, Kevin F Spratt3, James B Ames4, J Allen Graham5, Yvonne Y Cheung6. 1. Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA. 3. Statistician & Methodologist Innovation Labs, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA. 4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA. 5. Department of Radiology, Veteran Administration Hospital, White River Junction, VT, USA. 6. Department of Radiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA. Yvonne.cheung@hitchcock.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess diagnostic accuracy and agreement among radiologists in detecting femoroplasty on pre- and post-arthroscopic comparison frog lateral and anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs after treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, 86 patients underwent hip arthroscopy (52 with and 34 without femoroplasty) for treatment of FAI syndrome. Three radiologists blinded to clinical data and chronological order of the pre- and post-arthroscopic comparison radiographs independently examined AP pelvis and frog lateral radiographs to detect femoroplasty changes. Statistical analysis outputs included diagnostic accuracy parameters and inter- and intra-observer agreement. RESULTS: Identification of femoroplasty in the frog lateral projection has mean sensitivity 70%, specificity 82%, inter-observer agreement κ 0.74-0.76 and intra-observer agreement κ 0.72-0.85. Using the AP pelvis projection to detect femoroplasty has mean sensitivity 32%, specificity 71%, inter-observer agreement κ 0.47-0.65, and intra-observer agreement κ, 0.56-0.84. CONCLUSIONS: Radiologists are only moderately sensitive, though more specific, in femoroplasty detection in the frog lateral projection. The AP pelvis projection yields lower sensitivity and specificity. Both projections have moderate inter- and intra-observer agreement.
OBJECTIVE: To assess diagnostic accuracy and agreement among radiologists in detecting femoroplasty on pre- and post-arthroscopic comparison frog lateral and anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs after treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, 86 patients underwent hip arthroscopy (52 with and 34 without femoroplasty) for treatment of FAI syndrome. Three radiologists blinded to clinical data and chronological order of the pre- and post-arthroscopic comparison radiographs independently examined AP pelvis and frog lateral radiographs to detect femoroplasty changes. Statistical analysis outputs included diagnostic accuracy parameters and inter- and intra-observer agreement. RESULTS: Identification of femoroplasty in the frog lateral projection has mean sensitivity 70%, specificity 82%, inter-observer agreement κ 0.74-0.76 and intra-observer agreement κ 0.72-0.85. Using the AP pelvis projection to detect femoroplasty has mean sensitivity 32%, specificity 71%, inter-observer agreement κ 0.47-0.65, and intra-observer agreement κ, 0.56-0.84. CONCLUSIONS: Radiologists are only moderately sensitive, though more specific, in femoroplasty detection in the frog lateral projection. The AP pelvis projection yields lower sensitivity and specificity. Both projections have moderate inter- and intra-observer agreement.
Authors: Simon D Steppacher; Helen Anwander; Corinne A Zurmühle; Moritz Tannast; Klaus A Siebenrock Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: James R Ross; Christopher M Larson; Olusanjo Adeoye; Olusanjo Adeoyo; Bryan T Kelly; Asheesh Bedi Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Asheesh Gupta; John M Redmond; Christine E Stake; Nathan A Finch; Kevin F Dunne; Benjamin G Domb Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2014-07-23 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: James R Ross; Asheesh Bedi; Rebecca M Stone; Elizabeth Sibilsky Enselman; Michael Leunig; Bryan T Kelly; Christopher M Larson Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2014-04-15 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Steffen Thier; Daniel Gerisch; Christel Weiss; Stefan Fickert; Alexander Brunner Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2017-12-18 Impact factor: 3.411