Literature DB >> 12392442

Current opinion on computer-aided surgical navigation and robotics: role in the treatment of sports-related injuries.

Volker Musahl1, Anton Plakseychuk, Freddie H Fu.   

Abstract

Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) may allow surgeons to be more precise and minimally invasive, in addition to being an excellent research tool. Medical imaging, such as magnetic resonance and computed tomography is not only an important diagnostic tool, but also a necessary planning tool. In orthopaedic sports medicine, precision is needed when placing tunnels for soft tissue fixation of replacement grafts. Two types of CAS systems -- passive and active -- have been developed. Passive systems, or surgical navigation systems, provide the surgeon with additional information prior to and during the surgical procedure (in real time). Active systems have the ability of performing certain surgical steps autonomously. Both active and passive CAS systems are currently a subject of basic science and clinical investigations and will be discussed and commented on in this article. In summary, passive navigation systems can provide additional information to the surgeon and can therefore lead to more precise tunnel placement. Active robotic technology seems to be accurate and feasible with promising initial results from Europe. However, active and passive CAS can only be as precise as the surgeon who plans the procedure. Therefore, future studies have to focus on integrating, arthroscopy, 3-D image-enhanced computer navigation, and virtual kinematics, as well as to increase precision in surgical techniques.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12392442     DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200232130-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  35 in total

1.  Comparative tracking error analysis of five different optical tracking systems.

Authors:  R Khadem; C C Yeh; M Sadeghi-Tehrani; M R Bax; J A Johnson; J N Welch; E P Wilkinson; R Shahidi
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2000

2.  [ROBODOC--a path into the future of hip endoprosthetics or an investment error?].

Authors:  A Birke; H Reichel; W Hein; U Schietsch; R Hube; A Bernstein; T Krüger
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

3.  Relative contribution of the ACL, MCL, and bony contact to the anterior stability of the knee.

Authors:  M Sakane; G A Livesay; R J Fox; T W Rudy; T J Runco; S L Woo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Evaluation of a long-range transmitter for use with a magnetic tracking device in motion analysis.

Authors:  J S Day; G A Dumas; D J Murdoch
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Improving accuracy of bone resections using robotics tool holder and a high speed milling cutting tool.

Authors:  M Fadda; M Marcacci; S Toksvig-Larsen; T Wang; R Meneghello
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec

6.  How good are the results of ACL reconstruction?

Authors:  E Eriksson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Computer assisted knee surgery: diagnostics and planning of knee surgery.

Authors:  M Sati; J A de Guise; G Drouin
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  1997

8.  Accuracy of an electromagnetic tracking device: a study of the optimal range and metal interference.

Authors:  A D Milne; D G Chess; J A Johnson; G J King
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: endoscopic versus two-incision technique.

Authors:  C D Harner; P H Marks; F H Fu; J J Irrgang; M B Silby; R Mengato
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery. Image guided and robotic assistive technologies.

Authors:  A M DiGioia; B Jaramaz; B D Colgan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  6 in total

1.  Development of a simple device for measurement of rotational knee laxity.

Authors:  Volker Musahl; Kevin M Bell; Andrew G Tsai; Ryan S Costic; Robert Allaire; Thore Zantop; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Development of a three-dimensional detection method of cam deformities in femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Audenaert; Nick Baelde; Wouter Huysse; Lara Vigneron; Christophe Pattyn
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  [New concepts in image assisted surgery: automated patient registration based on the jaw and external ear].

Authors:  R Marmulla; J Mühling; T Lüth; G Eggers; S Hassfeld
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2003-11-07

Review 4.  Preoperative planning for intraoperative navigation guidance.

Authors:  Shahbaaz A Sabri; Philip J York
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

5.  Rotational knee laxity: reliability of a simple measurement device in vivo.

Authors:  Andrew G Tsai; Volker Musahl; Hanno Steckel; Kevin M Bell; Thore Zantop; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  A Preliminary In Vivo Assessment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knee Kinematics With the KneeM Device: A New Method to Assess Rotatory Laxity Using Open MRI.

Authors:  Nicolas Tardy; Philippe Marchand; Pascal Kouyoumdjian; Dominique Blin; Christophe Demattei; Gérard Asencio
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2014-03-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.