Literature DB >> 20698672

Constraining binding hot spots: NMR and molecular dynamics simulations provide a structural explanation for enthalpy-entropy compensation in SH2-ligand binding.

Joshua M Ward1, Nina M Gorenstein, Jianhua Tian, Stephen F Martin, Carol Beth Post.   

Abstract

NMR spectroscopy and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were used to probe the structure and dynamics of complexes of three phosphotyrosine-derived peptides with the Src SH2 domain in an effort to uncover a structural explanation for enthalpy-entropy compensation observed in the binding thermodynamics. The series of phosphotyrosine peptide derivatives comprises the natural pYEEI Src SH2 ligand, a constrained mimic, in which the phosphotyrosine (pY) residue is preorganized in the bound conformation for the purpose of gaining an entropic advantage to binding, and a flexible analogue of the constrained mimic. The expected gain in binding entropy of the constrained mimic was realized; however, a balancing loss in binding enthalpy was also observed that could not be rationalized from the crystallographic structures. We examined protein dynamics to evaluate whether the observed enthalpic penalty might be the result of effects arising from altered motions in the complex. (15)N-relaxation studies and positional fluctuations from molecular dynamics indicate that the main-chain dynamics of the protein show little variation among the three complexes. Root mean squared (rms) coordinate deviations vary by less than 1.5 A for all non-hydrogen atoms for the crystal structures and in the ensemble average structures calculated from the simulations. In contrast to this striking similarity in the structures and dynamics, there are a number of large chemical shift differences from residues across the binding interface, but particularly from key Src SH2 residues that interact with pY, the "hot spot" residue, which contributes about one-half of the binding free energy. Rank-order correlations between chemical shifts and ligand binding enthalpy for several pY-binding residues, coupled with available mutagenesis and calorimetric data, suggest that subtle structural perturbations (<1 A) from the conformational constraint of the pY residue sufficiently alter the geometry of enthalpically critical interactions in the binding pocket to cause the loss of binding enthalpy, leading to the observed enthalpy-entropy compensation. We find no evidence to support the premise that enthalpy-entropy compensation is an inherent property and conclude that preorganization of Src SH2 ligand residues involved in binding hot spots may eventuate in suboptimal interactions with the domain. We propose that introducing constraints elsewhere in the ligand could minimize enthalpy-entropy compensation effects. The results illustrate the utility of the NMR chemical shift to highlight small, but energetically significant, perturbations in structure that might otherwise go unnoticed in an apparently rigid protein.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20698672      PMCID: PMC2943377          DOI: 10.1021/ja910535j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  63 in total

Review 1.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules.

Authors:  Martin Karplus; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2002-09

2.  Lowering the entropic barrier for binding conformationally flexible inhibitors to enzymes.

Authors:  A R Khan; J C Parrish; M E Fraser; W W Smith; P A Bartlett; M N James
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Thermodynamic and structural effects of conformational constraints in protein-ligand interactions. Entropic paradoxy associated with ligand preorganization.

Authors:  John E DeLorbe; John H Clements; Martin G Teresk; Aaron P Benfield; Hilary R Plake; Laura E Millspaugh; Stephen F Martin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 4.  Win some, lose some: enthalpy-entropy compensation in weak intermolecular interactions.

Authors:  J D Dunitz
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  1995-11

5.  Identification by NMR of the binding surface for the histidine-containing phosphocarrier protein HPr on the N-terminal domain of enzyme I of the Escherichia coli phosphotransferase system.

Authors:  D S Garrett; Y J Seok; A Peterkofsky; G M Clore; A M Gronenborn
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  The contribution of vibrational entropy to molecular association. The dimerization of insulin.

Authors:  B Tidor; M Karplus
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-05-06       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Conformational constraint in protein ligand design and the inconsistency of binding entropy.

Authors:  D Gomika Udugamasooriya; Mark R Spaller
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Backbone dynamics of a free and phosphopeptide-complexed Src homology 2 domain studied by 15N NMR relaxation.

Authors:  N A Farrow; R Muhandiram; A U Singer; S M Pascal; C M Kay; G Gish; S E Shoelson; T Pawson; J D Forman-Kay; L E Kay
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1994-05-17       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Solution structure of the human pp60c-src SH2 domain complexed with a phosphorylated tyrosine pentapeptide.

Authors:  R X Xu; J M Word; D G Davis; M J Rink; D H Willard; R T Gampe
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-02-21       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Requirements for specific binding of low affinity inhibitor fragments to the SH2 domain of (pp60)Src are identical to those for high affinity binding of full length inhibitors.

Authors:  Gudrun Lange; Dominique Lesuisse; Pierre Deprez; Bernard Schoot; Petra Loenze; Didier Bénard; Jean-Pierre Marquette; Pierre Broto; Edoardo Sarubbi; Eliane Mandine
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 7.446

View more
  17 in total

1.  Evaluating the dynamics and electrostatic interactions of folded proteins in implicit solvents.

Authors:  Duy P Hua; He Huang; Amitava Roy; Carol Beth Post
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Natural Products and Their Mimics as Targets of Opportunity for Discovery.

Authors:  Stephen F Martin
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.354

3.  Entropic allostery dominates the phosphorylation-dependent regulation of Syk tyrosine kinase release from immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs.

Authors:  Chao Feng; Amitava Roy; Carol Beth Post
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 4.  Entropy-enthalpy compensation: role and ramifications in biomolecular ligand recognition and design.

Authors:  John D Chodera; David L Mobley
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 12.981

Review 5.  Limiting assumptions in structure-based design: binding entropy.

Authors:  Garland R Marshall
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Entropy Hotspots for the Binding of Intrinsically Disordered Ligands to a Receptor Domain.

Authors:  Jie Shi; Qingliang Shen; Jae-Hyun Cho; Wonmuk Hwang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Differential recognition of syk-binding sites by each of the two phosphotyrosine-binding pockets of the Vav SH2 domain.

Authors:  Chih-Hong Chen; Dan Piraner; Nina M Gorenstein; Robert L Geahlen; Carol Beth Post
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Detection of long-range concerted motions in protein by a distance covariance.

Authors:  Amitava Roy; Carol Beth Post
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Protein-Ligand Interactions: Thermodynamic Effects Associated with Increasing the Length of an Alkyl Chain.

Authors:  James M Myslinski; John H Clements; John E Delorbe; Stephen F Martin
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 4.345

10.  A simplified confinement method for calculating absolute free energies and free energy and entropy differences.

Authors:  Victor Ovchinnikov; Marco Cecchini; Martin Karplus
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.