Literature DB >> 19886660

Thermodynamic and structural effects of conformational constraints in protein-ligand interactions. Entropic paradoxy associated with ligand preorganization.

John E DeLorbe1, John H Clements, Martin G Teresk, Aaron P Benfield, Hilary R Plake, Laura E Millspaugh, Stephen F Martin.   

Abstract

Succinate- and cyclopropane-derived phosphotyrosine (pY) replacements were incorporated into a series of Grb2 SH2 binding ligands wherein the pY+1 residue was varied to determine explicitly how variations in ligand preorganization affect binding energetics and structure. The complexes of these ligands with the Grb2 SH2 domain were examined in a series of thermodynamic and structural investigations using isothermal titration calorimetry and X-ray crystallography. The binding enthalpies for all ligands were favorable, and although binding entropies for all ligands having a hydrophobic residue at the pY+1 site were favorable, binding entropies for those having a hydrophilic residue at this site were unfavorable. Preorganized ligands generally bound with more favorable Gibbs energies than their flexible controls, but this increased affinity was the consequence of relatively more favorable binding enthalpies. Unexpectedly, binding entropies of the constrained ligands were uniformly disfavored relative to their flexible controls, demonstrating that the widely held belief that ligand preorganization should result in an entropic advantage is not necessarily true. Crystallographic studies of complexes of several flexible and constrained ligands having the same amino acid at the pY+1 position revealed extensive similarities, but there were some notable differences. There are a greater number of direct polar contacts in complexes of the constrained ligands that correlate qualitatively with their more favorable binding enthalpies and Gibbs energies. There are more single water-mediated contacts between the domain and the flexible ligand of each pair; although fixing water molecules at a protein-ligand interface is commonly viewed as entropically unfavorable, entropies for forming these complexes are favored relative to those of their constrained counterparts. Crystallographic b-factors in the complexes of constrained ligands are greater than those of their flexible counterparts, an observation that seems inconsistent with our finding that entropies for forming complexes of flexible ligands are relatively more favorable. This systematic study highlights the profound challenges and complexities associated with predicting how structural changes in a ligand will affect enthalpies, entropies, and structure in protein-ligand interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19886660     DOI: 10.1021/ja904698q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  42 in total

1.  B-factor Analysis and Conformational Rearrangement of Aldose Reductase.

Authors:  Ganesaratnam K Balendiran; J Rajendran Pandian; Evin Drake; Anubhav Vinayak; Malkhey Verma; Duilio Cascio
Journal:  Curr Proteomics       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.837

2.  Small-molecule libraries: naturally inspired oligomers.

Authors:  Jeffrey Aubé
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 24.427

3.  Peptide bicycles that inhibit the Grb2 SH2 domain.

Authors:  Justin S Quartararo; Pianpian Wu; Joshua A Kritzer
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.164

4.  Protein-ligand interactions: thermodynamic effects associated with increasing nonpolar surface area.

Authors:  James M Myslinski; John E DeLorbe; John H Clements; Stephen F Martin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Protein-ligand interactions: probing the energetics of a putative cation-π interaction.

Authors:  James M Myslinski; John H Clements; Stephen F Martin
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Natural Products and Their Mimics as Targets of Opportunity for Discovery.

Authors:  Stephen F Martin
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.354

7.  Protein-ligand binding enthalpies from near-millisecond simulations: Analysis of a preorganization paradox.

Authors:  Amanda Li; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Entropy-enthalpy transduction caused by conformational shifts can obscure the forces driving protein-ligand binding.

Authors:  Andrew T Fenley; Hari S Muddana; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Thermodynamics of ligand binding and efficiency.

Authors:  Charles H Reynolds; M Katharine Holloway
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 4.345

10.  OpenStructure: a flexible software framework for computational structural biology.

Authors:  Marco Biasini; Valerio Mariani; Jürgen Haas; Stefan Scheuber; Andreas D Schenk; Torsten Schwede; Ansgar Philippsen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.