Literature DB >> 23268557

A simplified confinement method for calculating absolute free energies and free energy and entropy differences.

Victor Ovchinnikov1, Marco Cecchini, Martin Karplus.   

Abstract

A simple and robust formulation of the path-independent confinement method for the calculation of free energies is presented. The simplified confinement method (SCM) does not require matrix diagonalization or switching off the molecular force field, and has a simple convergence criterion. The method can be readily implemented in molecular dynamics programs with minimal or no code modifications. Because the confinement method is a special case of thermodynamic integration, it is trivially parallel over the integration variable. The accuracy of the method is demonstrated using a model diatomic molecule, for which exact results can be computed analytically. The method is then applied to the alanine dipeptide in vacuum, and to the α-helix ↔ β-sheet transition in a 16-residue peptide modeled in implicit solvent. The SCM requires less effort for the calculation of free energy differences than previous formulations because it does not require computing normal modes. The SCM has a diminished advantage for determining absolute free energy values, because it requires decreasing the MD integration step to obtain accurate results. An approximate confinement procedure is introduced, which can be used to estimate directly the configurational entropy difference between two macrostates, without the need for additional computation of the difference in the free energy or enthalpy. The approximation has convergence properties similar to those of the standard confinement method for the calculation of free energies. The use of the approximation requires about 5 times less wall-clock simulation time than that needed to compute enthalpy differences to similar precision from an MD trajectory. For the biomolecular systems considered in this study, the errors in the entropy approximation are under 10%. Practical applications of the methods to proteins are currently limited to implicit solvent simulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23268557      PMCID: PMC3569517          DOI: 10.1021/jp3080578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  40 in total

1.  Large Amplitude Elastic Motions in Proteins from a Single-Parameter, Atomic Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1996-08-26       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Analysis and elimination of a bias in targeted molecular dynamics simulations of conformational transitions: application to calmodulin.

Authors:  Victor Ovchinnikov; Martin Karplus
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Escaping free-energy minima.

Authors:  Alessandro Laio; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Exploring the free-energy landscape of a short peptide using an average force.

Authors:  Christophe Chipot; Jérôme Hénin
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  An efficient, path-independent method for free-energy calculations.

Authors:  Michael D Tyka; Anthony R Clarke; Richard B Sessions
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  From A to B in free energy space.

Authors:  Davide Branduardi; Francesco Luigi Gervasio; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Absolute free-energy calculations of liquids using a harmonic reference state.

Authors:  Michael D Tyka; Richard B Sessions; Anthony R Clarke
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 8.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  The contribution of vibrational entropy to molecular association. The dimerization of insulin.

Authors:  B Tidor; M Karplus
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-05-06       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) dihedral angles.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Xiao Zhu; Jihyun Shim; Pedro E M Lopes; Jeetain Mittal; Michael Feig; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effect of subdomain interactions on methyl group dynamics in the hydrophobic core of villin headpiece protein.

Authors:  Liliya Vugmeyster; Tien Do; Dmitry Ostrovsky; Riqianq Fu
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Investigations of α-helix↔β-sheet transition pathways in a miniprotein using the finite-temperature string method.

Authors:  Victor Ovchinnikov; Martin Karplus
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Differential Local Stability Governs the Metamorphic Fold Switch of Bacterial Virulence Factor RfaH.

Authors:  Pablo Galaz-Davison; José Alejandro Molina; Steve Silletti; Elizabeth A Komives; Stefan H Knauer; Irina Artsimovitch; César A Ramírez-Sarmiento
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Co-operative intra-protein structural response due to protein-protein complexation revealed through thermodynamic quantification: study of MDM2-p53 binding.

Authors:  Sudipta Samanta; Sanchita Mukherjee
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Computing the relative stabilities and the per-residue components in protein conformational changes.

Authors:  Arijit Roy; Alberto Perez; Ken A Dill; Justin L Maccallum
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  Correcting for the free energy costs of bond or angle constraints in molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Gerhard König; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-09-16

7.  Network-Wide Screen Identifies Variation of Novel Precise On-Module Targets Using Conformational Modudaoism.

Authors:  Bing Li; Jun Liu; Yanan Yu; Pengqian Wang; Yingying Zhang; Xumin Ni; Qiong Liu; Xiaoxu Zhang; Zhong Wang; Yongyan Wang
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2017-11-20

8.  Computation of Hemagglutinin Free Energy Difference by the Confinement Method.

Authors:  Sander Boonstra; Patrick R Onck; Erik van der Giessen
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.991

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.