Literature DB >> 14613321

Requirements for specific binding of low affinity inhibitor fragments to the SH2 domain of (pp60)Src are identical to those for high affinity binding of full length inhibitors.

Gudrun Lange1, Dominique Lesuisse, Pierre Deprez, Bernard Schoot, Petra Loenze, Didier Bénard, Jean-Pierre Marquette, Pierre Broto, Edoardo Sarubbi, Eliane Mandine.   

Abstract

Results from a novel approach which uses protein crystallography for the screening of a low affinity inhibitor fragment library are analyzed by comparing the X-ray structures with bound fragments to the structures with the corresponding full length inhibitors. The screen for new phospho-tyrosine mimics binding to the SH2 domain of (pp60)src was initiated because of the limited cell penetration of phosphates. Fragments in our library typically had between 6 and 30 atoms and included compounds which had either millimolar activity in a Biacore assay or were suggested by the ab initio design program LUDI but had no measurable affinity. All identified fragments were located in the phospho-tyrosine pocket. The most promising fragments were successfully used to replace the phospho-tyrosine and resulted in novel nonpeptidic high affinity inhibitors. The significant diversity of successful fragments is reflected in the high flexibility of the phospho-tyrosine pocket. Comparison of the X-ray structures shows that the presence of the H-bond acceptors and not their relative position within the pharmacophore are essential for fragment binding and/or high affinity binding of full length inhibitors. The X-ray data show that the fragments are recognized by forming a complex H-bond network within the phospho-tyrosine pocket of SH2. No fragment structure was found in which this H-bond network was incomplete, and any uncompensated H-bond within the H-bond network leads to a significant decrease in the affinity of full length inhibitors. No correlation between affinity and fragment binding was found for these polar fragments and hence affinity-based screening would have overlooked some interesting starting points for inhibitor design. In contrast, we were unable to identify electron density for hydrophobic fragments, confirming that hydrophobic interactions are important for inhibitor affinity but of minor importance for ligand recognition. Our results suggest that a screening approach using protein crystallography is particularly useful to identify universal fragments for the conserved hydrophilic recognition sites found in target families such as SH2 domains, phosphatases, kinases, proteases, and esterases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14613321     DOI: 10.1021/jm020970s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


  9 in total

1.  Hit clustering can improve virtual fragment screening: CDK2 and PARP1 case studies.

Authors:  Alexey A Zeifman; Victor S Stroylov; Fedor N Novikov; Oleg V Stroganov; Alexandra L Zakharenko; Svetlana N Khodyreva; Olga I Lavrik; Ghermes G Chilov
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Can free energy calculations be fast and accurate at the same time? Binding of low-affinity, non-peptide inhibitors to the SH2 domain of the src protein.

Authors:  Christophe Chipot; Xavier Rozanska; Surjit B Dixit
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Purification, crystallization, small-angle X-ray scattering and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of the SH2 domain of the Csk-homologous kinase.

Authors:  Natalie J Gunn; Michael A Gorman; Renwick C J Dobson; Michael W Parker; Terrence D Mulhern
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun       Date:  2011-02-23

4.  Ligand deconstruction: Why some fragment binding positions are conserved and others are not.

Authors:  Dima Kozakov; David R Hall; Stefan Jehle; Sefan Jehle; Lingqi Luo; Stefan O Ochiana; Elizabeth V Jones; Michael Pollastri; Karen N Allen; Adrian Whitty; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Dissecting the Influence of Protein Flexibility on the Location and Thermodynamic Profile of Explicit Water Molecules in Protein-Ligand Binding.

Authors:  Ying Yang; Markus A Lill
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 6.  Dehydroamino acids: chemical multi-tools for late-stage diversification.

Authors:  Jonathan W Bogart; Albert A Bowers
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Constraining binding hot spots: NMR and molecular dynamics simulations provide a structural explanation for enthalpy-entropy compensation in SH2-ligand binding.

Authors:  Joshua M Ward; Nina M Gorenstein; Jianhua Tian; Stephen F Martin; Carol Beth Post
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Functional site profiling and electrostatic analysis of cysteines modifiable to cysteine sulfenic acid.

Authors:  Freddie R Salsbury; Stacy T Knutson; Leslie B Poole; Jacquelyn S Fetrow
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 9.  Lessons from Hot Spot Analysis for Fragment-Based Drug Discovery.

Authors:  David R Hall; Dima Kozakov; Adrian Whitty; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 14.819

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.