Literature DB >> 11521847

Stream segregation of narrow-band noise bursts.

A S Bregman1, P A Ahad, C Van Loon.   

Abstract

Normally hearing adults heard rapid alternations of a pair of band-limited noise bursts that had flat spectra (in terms of equal-loudness weighting of components) and sharp band edges. The bursts differed in center frequency (CF), but were matched on overall intensity, on bandwidth (BW) on a log frequency scale, and (roughly) on pitch strength. Listeners judged the ease with which the sequence could be held together perceptually in a single auditory stream (vs. forming separate high and low streams). Involuntary segregation was examined as a function of the following measures of frequency separation of the alternating noise bands: (1) the closest band edges, (2) the most remote band edges, (3) the CFs of the bands on a logarithmic scale, and (4) the BWs. Segregation was best predicted from the separation of the two CFs on a log-frequency scale (very strong effect). Increasing the BWs of the two alternating bursts (the same size, in log frequency, for both bands) also led to greater segregation (very weak effect).

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11521847     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  7 in total

1.  Objective and subjective psychophysical measures of auditory stream integration and segregation.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-24

2.  Local and global auditory processing: behavioral and ERP evidence.

Authors:  Lisa D Sanders; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 3.  Convergence of thalamic and cortical pathways in cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Charles C Lee; Jeffery A Winer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Auditory stream segregation and the perception of across-frequency synchrony.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Cynthia Hunter; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Auditory stream segregation of iterated rippled noises by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Daniel E Shearer; Michelle R Molis; Keri O Bennett; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Properties of auditory stream formation.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Hedwig E Gockel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Sequential stream segregation in normally-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.