Literature DB >> 20683704

Osteoporosis pharmacotherapy following bone densitometry: importance of patient beliefs and understanding of DXA results.

D Brask-Lindemann1, S M Cadarette, P Eskildsen, B Abrahamsen.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Persistence with osteoporosis therapy remains low and identification of factors associated with better persistence is essential in preventing osteoporosis and fractures. In this study, patient understanding of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) results and beliefs in effects of treatment were associated with treatment initiation and persistence.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to examine patient understanding of their DXA results and evaluate factors associated with initiation of and persistence with prescribed medication in first-time users of anti-osteoporotic agents. Self-reported DXA results reflect patient understanding of diagnosis and may influence acceptance of osteoporosis therapy. To improve patient understanding of DXA results, we provided written information to patients and their referring general practitioner (GP), and evaluated factors associated with osteoporosis treatment initiation and 1-year persistence.
METHODS: Information on diagnosis was mailed to 1,000 consecutive patients and their GPs after DXA testing. One year after, a questionnaire was mailed to all patients to evaluate self-report of DXA results, drug initiation and 1-year persistence. Quadratic weighted kappa was used to estimate agreement between self-report and actual DXA results. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of understanding of diagnosis, and correlates of treatment initiation and persistence.
RESULTS: A total of 717 patients responded (72%). Overall, only 4% were unaware of DXA results. Agreement between self-reported and actual DXA results was very good (κ = 0.83); younger age and glucocorticoid use were associated with better understanding. Correctly reported DXA results was associated with treatment initiation (OR 4.3, 95% CI 1.2-15.1, p = 0.02), and greater beliefs in drug treatment benefits were associated with treatment initiation (OR 1.4, 95%CI 1.1-1.9, p = 0.006) and persistence with therapy (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7, p = 0.006).
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that written information provides over 80% of patients with a basic understanding of their DXA results. Communicating results in writing may improve patient understanding thereby also improve osteoporosis management and prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20683704      PMCID: PMC5047755          DOI: 10.1007/s00198-010-1365-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  36 in total

1.  Do patients receive appropriate information and treatment following bone mineral density measurements?

Authors:  R Kilding; R Eastell; N Peel
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 2.  How can osteoporosis patients benefit more from their therapy? Adherence issues with bisphosphonate therapy.

Authors:  Deborah T Gold; Ivy M Alexander; Mark P Ettinger
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 3.154

3.  Patients' beliefs about prescribed medicines and their role in adherence to treatment in chronic physical illness.

Authors:  R Horne; J Weinman
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Patient education in groups increases knowledge of osteoporosis and adherence to treatment: a two-year randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dorthe Nielsen; Jesper Ryg; Winnie Nielsen; Berit Knold; Nis Nissen; Kim Brixen
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-04-18

5.  Early discontinuation of treatment for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Anna N A Tosteson; Margaret R Grove; Cristina S Hammond; Megan M Moncur; G Thomas Ray; Gwen M Hebert; Alice R Pressman; Bruce Ettinger
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Patients' adherence to osteoporosis therapy: exploring the perceptions of postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Elaine Lau; Alexandra Papaioannou; Lisa Dolovich; Jonathan Adachi; Anna M Sawka; Sheri Burns; Kalpana Nair; Anjali Pathak
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  German primary care doctors' awareness of osteoporosis and knowledge of national guidelines.

Authors:  R Chenot; C Scheidt-Nave; S Gabler; M M Kochen; W Himmel
Journal:  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.949

Review 8.  Therapeutic adherence to bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Juraj Payer; Zdenko Killinger; Peter Celec
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 6.529

Review 9.  Overcoming barriers to osteoporosis care in vulnerable elderly patients with hip fractures.

Authors:  Julie A Switzer; Susan Jaglal; Earl R Bogoch
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  Persistence and switching patterns among women with varied osteoporosis medication histories: 12-month results from POSSIBLE US.

Authors:  A N A Tosteson; T P Do; S W Wade; M S Anthony; R W Downs
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  12 in total

1.  Hip fracture and other predictors of anti-osteoporosis drug use in Norway.

Authors:  H M Devold; A J Søgaard; A Tverdal; J A Falch; K Furu; H E Meyer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  A systematic review of factors affecting medication adherence among patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  C T Yeam; S Chia; H C C Tan; Y H Kwan; W Fong; J J B Seng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Factors influencing the pharmacological management of osteoporosis after fragility fracture: results from the Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy's fracture clinic screening program.

Authors:  D E Beaton; S Dyer; D Jiang; R Sujic; M Slater; J E M Sale; E R Bogoch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Long-term persistence in patients with osteoporosis receiving denosumab in routine practice: 36-month non-interventional, observational study.

Authors:  D M Borek; R C Smith; C N Gruber; B L Gruber
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  [The Ludwigshafen Osteoporosis Screening Questionnaire (LOS Questionnaire): result of the evaluation of anamnestic risk factors in osteoporosis diagnostics].

Authors:  C Wölfl; C Takur; A A Moghaddam; G Zimmermann; M Hitzler; H Schmidt-Gayk; B Höner; P A Grützner; L Kolios
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Association between refill compliance to oral bisphosphonate treatment, incident fractures, and health care costs--an analysis using national health databases.

Authors:  K R Olsen; C Hansen; B Abrahamsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  The impact of bone mineral density testing, fracture assessment, and osteoporosis education in men treated by androgen deprivation for prostate cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Michelle Nadler; Shabbir Alibhai; Pamela Catton; Charles Catton; Jennifer Jones
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Anamnestic risk factor questionnaire as reliable diagnostic instrument for osteoporosis (reduced bone morphogenic density).

Authors:  Leila Kolios; Caner Takur; Arash Moghaddam; Mirjam Hitzler; Heinrich Schmidt-Gayk; Arnold J Suda; Bernd Höner; Paul A Grützner; Christoph Wölfl
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 9.  Understanding patients' adherence-related beliefs about medicines prescribed for long-term conditions: a meta-analytic review of the Necessity-Concerns Framework.

Authors:  Rob Horne; Sarah C E Chapman; Rhian Parham; Nick Freemantle; Alastair Forbes; Vanessa Cooper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Osteoporosis treatment gap in a prospective cohort of volunteer women.

Authors:  L Iconaru; C Smeys; F Baleanu; V Kinnard; M Moreau; S Cappelle; M Surquin; M Rubinstein; S Rozenberg; M Paesmans; R Karmali; P Bergmann; J J Body
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.